Evidence mapPaperPMID 34585281Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of nutrition2022

Pulse consumption improves indices of glycemic control in adults with and without type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of acute and long-term randomized controlled trials.

Maryam S Hafiz, Matthew D Campbell, Lauren L O'Mahoney, Melvin Holmes, Caroline Orfila, Christine Boesch

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maryam S HafizSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5769-175X
Matthew D CampbellSchool of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5883-5041
Lauren L O'MahoneyLeicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2786-3290
Melvin HolmesSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6819-1048
Caroline OrfilaSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2564-8068
Christine BoeschSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. c.bosch@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-5709
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

King Abdulaziz University PhD scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFindings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of pulse intake on glycemic control are inconsistent and conclusive evidence is lacking. The aim of this study was to systematically review the impact of pulse consumption on post-prandial and long-term glycemic control in adults with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D).

methodsDatabases were searched for RCTs, reporting outcomes of post-prandial and long-term interventions with different pulse types on parameters of glycemic control in normoglycemic and T2D adults. Effect size (ES) was calculated using random effect model and meta-regression was conducted to assess the impact of various moderator variables such as pulse type, form, dose, and study duration on ES.

resultsFrom 3334 RCTs identified, 65 studies were eligible for inclusion involving 2102 individuals. In acute RCTs, pulse intake significantly reduced peak post-prandial glucose concentration in participants with T2D (ES  - 2.90; 95%CI  - 4.60,  - 1.21; p ≤ 0.001; I

conclusionPulse consumption significantly reduced acute post-prandial glucose concentration > 1 mmol/L in normoglycemic adults and > 2.5 mmol/L in those with T2D, and improved a range of long-term glycemic control parameters in adults with and without T2D. PROSPERO REGISTRY NUMBER: (CRD42019162322).

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glycemic ControlAdultBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHeart RateHumansInsulinRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinInsulinDiabetesGlucoseMeta-analysisPostprandial glycemiaPulsesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34585281
PMCPMC8854292
OpenAlexW3202516774

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.