Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34589385›Full record

ReviewActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2021

Membrane-disruptive peptides/peptidomimetics-based therapeutics: Promising systems to combat bacteria and cancer in the drug-resistant era.

Liming Lin, Jiaying Chi, Yilang Yan, Rui Luo, Xiaoqian Feng, Yuwei Zheng, Dongyi Xian, Xin Li, Guilan Quan, Daojun Liu and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cell-Free DNA-Based Theranostics for Inflammatory Disorders.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Liming LinSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Jiaying ChiCollege of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.
Yilang YanCollege of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.
Rui LuoCollege of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.
Xiaoqian FengSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Yuwei ZhengCollege of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.
Dongyi XianCollege of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.
Xin LiThe Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China.
Guilan QuanCollege of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.
Daojun LiuShantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China.
Chuanbin WuCollege of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.
Chao LuCollege of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China.
Xin PanSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Jinan University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNShantou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane-disruptive peptides/peptidomimetics (MDPs) are antimicrobials or anticarcinogens that present a general killing mechanism through the physical disruption of cell membranes, in contrast to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs, which act on precise targets such as DNA or specific enzymes. Owing to their rapid action, broad-spectrum activity, and mechanisms of action that potentially hinder the development of resistance, MDPs have been increasingly considered as future therapeutics in the drug-resistant era. Recently, growing experimental evidence has demonstrated that MDPs can also be utilized as adjuvants to enhance the therapeutic effects of other agents. In this review, we evaluate the literature around the broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties and anticancer activity of MDPs, and summarize the current development and mechanisms of MDPs alone or in combination with other agents. Notably, this review highlights recent advances in the design of various MDP-based drug delivery systems that can improve the therapeutic effect of MDPs, minimize side effects, and promote the co-delivery of multiple chemotherapeutics, for more efficient antimicrobial and anticancer therapy.

Indexed as

Combination therapyDrug delivery systemsDrug-resistanceMembrane-disruptive peptides/peptidomimetics

Identifiers

PMID34589385
PMCPMC8463292
OpenAlexW3184585025

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.