ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2021
Structural heart defects associated with ET
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling the Prevalence and Surgical Burden of Neurocristopathies: A Scoping Review and Statistical Analysis.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHSCR, a colonic neurocristopathy affecting 1/5000 births, is suggested to associate with cardiac septal defects and conotruncal malformations. However, we question subtle cardiac changes maybe more commonly present due to multi-regulations by HSCR candidate genes, in this instance, ET
methodsEleven neonatal rats were generated from heterozygote (ET
resultsCardiac morphology and constituents were preserved. However, significant volumetric reductions were recorded in sl/sl rats with respect to the control: whole heart (38.70%, p value = 0.02); LV (41.22%, p value = 0.01), RV (46.15%, p value = 0.02), LA (44.93%, p value = 0.06), and RA (39.49%, p value = 0.02). Consistent trend was observed in growth rate (~ 20%) and organ-volume/bodyweight ratios (~ 25%). On the contrary, measurements on aortic arch demonstrated no significant difference among the two groups.
conclusionDespite the presence of normal morphology, significant cardiac growth retardation was detected in sl/sl rat, supporting the likely association of cardiac anomalies with HSCR, at least in ET
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.