Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34610023›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Pulmonary valve tissue engineering strategies in large animal models.

M Uiterwijk, D C van der Valk, R van Vliet, I J de Brouwer, C R Hooijmans, J Kluin

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M UiterwijkHeart Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8903-6290
D C van der ValkDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
R van VlietFaculty of medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
I J de BrouwerFaculty of medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C R HooijmansDepartment for Health Evidence Unit SYRCLE, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6435-5714
J KluinHeart Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLEindhoven University of Technology · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last 25 years, numerous tissue engineered heart valve (TEHV) strategies have been studied in large animal models. To evaluate, qualify and summarize all available publications, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We identified 80 reports that studied TEHVs of synthetic or natural scaffolds in pulmonary position (n = 693 animals). We identified substantial heterogeneity in study designs, methods and outcomes. Most importantly, the quality assessment showed poor reporting in randomization and blinding strategies. Meta-analysis showed no differences in mortality and rate of valve regurgitation between different scaffolds or strategies. However, it revealed a higher transvalvular pressure gradient in synthetic scaffolds (11.6 mmHg; 95% CI, [7.31-15.89]) compared to natural scaffolds (4,67 mmHg; 95% CI, [3,94-5.39]; p = 0.003). These results should be interpreted with caution due to lack of a standardized control group, substantial study heterogeneity, and relatively low number of comparable studies in subgroup analyses. Based on this review, the most adequate scaffold model is still undefined. This review endorses that, to move the TEHV field forward and enable reliable comparisons, it is essential to define standardized methods and ways of reporting. This would greatly enhance the value of individual large animal studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsHeart Valve ProsthesisModels, AnimalPulmonary ValveTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID34610023
PMCPMC8491907
OpenAlexW3202768037

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.