ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2022
Design and methods of the Apple Women's Health Study: a digital longitudinal cohort study.
Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable Sensing for Clinical Physiology Monitoring: Emerging Paradigms.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
- Digital Tools for the Recognition and Triage of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Associations between self-reported personal care products use and menstrual cycle length and regularity in a US digital cohort.Environment international · 2026Article
- Variability of menstrual cycles by age, polycystic ovary syndrome, and early-life cycle irregularity in the apple Women's Health Study.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- A digital-health multidomain lifestyle management framework and its associations with cardiometabolic health: a real-world observational study.BMC medicine · 2026Observational
- Menstrual product use patterns in a large digital cohort in the United States: variations by sociodemographic, health, and menstrual characteristics.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Article
- Signs of Potential Androgen Excess Across the Lifespan in a US-based Digital Cohort Study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- Performance of algorithms using wrist temperature for retrospective ovulation day estimate and next menses start day prediction: a prospective cohort study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Observational
- Utilizing a digital cohort to understand the health burden and lifestyle characteristics across the life course in individuals with polycystic ovary syndrome and possible PCOS.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of collecting passive phone usage and sensor data via Apple SensorKit.PloS one · 2025Article
- Trends in sensor-based health metrics during and after pregnancy: descriptive data from the apple women's health study.AJOG global reports · 2024Article
- Early-life menstrual characteristics and gestational diabetes in a large US cohort.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2024Article
- Understanding activity and physiology at scale: The Apple Heart & Movement Study.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Current Ovulation and Luteal Phase Tracking Methods and Technologies for Fertility and Family Planning: A Review.Seminars in reproductive medicine · 2024Review
- Menarche and Time to Cycle Regularity Among Individuals Born Between 1950 and 2005 in the US.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Irregular Cycles, Ovulatory Disorders, and Cardiometabolic Conditions in a US-Based Digital Cohort.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Feasibility Study on Menstrual Cycles With Fitbit Device (FEMFIT): Prospective Observational Cohort Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Observational
- Seasonal variations of menstrual cycle length in a large, US-based, digital cohort.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2024Article
- Current Epidemiological Status of Chikungunya Virus Infection in East Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of tropical medicine · 2024Review
- Health Disparities, Clinical Trials, and the Digital Divide.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProspective longitudinal cohorts assessing women's health and gynecologic conditions have historically been limited.
objectiveThe Apple Women's Health Study was designed to gain a deeper understanding of the relationship among menstrual cycles, health, and behavior. This paper describes the design and methods of the ongoing Apple Women's Health Study and provides the demographic characteristics of the first 10,000 participants. STUDY
designThis was a mobile-application-based longitudinal cohort study involving survey and sensor-based data. We collected the data from 10,000 participants who responded to the demographics survey on enrollment between November 14, 2019 and May 20, 2020. The participants were asked to complete a monthly follow-up through November 2020. The eligibility included installed Apple Research app on their iPhone with iOS version 13.2 or later, were living in the United States, being of age greater than 18 years (19 in Alabama and Nebraska, 21 years old in Puerto Rico), were comfortable in communicating in written and spoken English, were the sole user of an iCloud account or iPhone, and were willing to provide consent to participate in the study.
resultsThe mean age at enrollment was 33.6 years old (±standard deviation, 10.3). The race and ethnicity was representative of the US population (69% White and Non-Hispanic [6910/10,000]), whereas 51% (5089/10,000) had a college education or above. The participant geographic distribution included all the US states and Puerto Rico. Seventy-two percent (7223/10,000) reported the use of an Apple Watch, and 24.4% (2438/10,000) consented to sensor-based data collection. For this cohort, 38% (3490/9238) did not respond to the Monthly Survey: Menstrual Update after enrollment. At the 6-month follow-up, there was a 35% (3099/8972) response rate to the Monthly Survey: Menstrual Update. 82.7% (8266/10,000) of the initial cohort and 95.1% (2948/3099) of the participants who responded to month 6 of the Monthly Survey: Menstrual Update tracked at least 1 menstrual cycle via HealthKit. The participants tracked their menstrual bleeding days for an average of 4.44 (25%-75%; range, 3-6) calendar months during the study period. Non-White participants were slightly more likely to drop out than White participants; those remaining at 6 months were otherwise similar in demographic characteristics to the original enrollment group.
conclusionThe first 10,000 participants of the Apple Women's Health Study were recruited via the Research app and were diverse in race and ethnicity, educational attainment, and economic status, despite all using an Apple iPhone. Future studies within this cohort incorporating this high-dimensional data may facilitate discovery in women's health in exposure outcome relationships and population-level trends among iPhone users. Retention efforts centered around education, communication, and engagement will be utilized to improve the survey response rates, such as the study update feature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.