Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34612676›Full record

ArticlemSphere2021

Predicted Functional and Structural Diversity of Receiver Domains in Fungal Two-Component Regulatory Systems.

Robert B Bourret, Clay A Foster, William E Goldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert B BourretDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6666-9220
Clay A FosterDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
William E GoldmanDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Signal Transduction by Two-Component Regulatory SystemsR01GM050860 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BOURRET, ROBERT B. · 1994 to 2025
$7.9M
The evolution of virulence in the fungal pathogen HistoplasmaR01AI153523 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MATUTE, DANIEL · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI153523NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal two-component regulatory systems incorporate receiver domains into hybrid histidine kinases (HHKs) and response regulators. We constructed a nonredundant database of 670 fungal receiver domain sequences from 51 species sampled from nine fungal phyla. A much greater proportion (21%) of predicted fungal response regulators did not belong to known groups than previously appreciated. Receiver domains in Rim15 response regulators from Ascomycota and other phyla are very different from one another, as are the duplicate receiver domains in group XII HHKs. Fungal receiver domains from five known types of response regulators and 20 known types of HHKs exhibit distinct patterns of amino acids at conserved and variable positions known to be structurally and functionally important in bacterial receiver domains. We inferred structure/activity relationships from the patterns and propose multiple experimentally testable hypotheses about the mechanisms of signal transduction mediated by fungal receiver domains.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalFungal ProteinsFungiHistidine KinaseSignal TransductionFungal ProteinsHistidine Kinasefungihybrid histidine kinasereceiver domainresponse regulatortwo-component regulatory systems

Identifiers

PMID34612676
PMCPMC8510515

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.