ReviewHaematologica2022
Integrating genetic and epigenetic factors in chronic myeloid leukemia risk assessment: toward gene expression-based biomarkers.
Review in Haematologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral arsenic plus imatinib versus imatinib solely for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: a randomized phase 3 trial with 5-year outcomes.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Epigenetics and In Silico Transcriptome Analysis of Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Article
- Understanding drug resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia through the lens of leukemic stem cell states: insights from single-cell analyses.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Transcriptional readthrough precedes alternative splicing programs triggered in CML cells by imatinib.Science advances · 2026Article
- Review
- Transcriptional readthrough precedes alternative splicing programs triggered in CML cells by imatinib.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- EZH2 modulates mRNA splicing and exerts part of its oncogenic function through repression of splicing factors in CML.Leukemia · 2025Article
- Potential signaling pathways, biomarkers, natural drugs, and chronic myeloid leukemia therapeutics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Review
- A high proportion of germline variants in pediatric chronic myeloid leukemia.Molecular cancer · 2024Article
- Mutations in myeloid transcription factors and activated signaling genes predict chronic myeloid leukemia outcomes.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms and Biomarkers on the Effectiveness and Toxicity of Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer treatment is constantly evolving from a one-size-fits-all towards bespoke approaches for each patient. In certain solid cancers, including breast and lung, tumor genome profiling has been incorporated into therapeutic decision-making. For chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), while tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is the standard treatment, current clinical scoring systems cannot accurately predict the heterogeneous treatment outcomes observed in patients. Biomarkers capable of segregating patients according to outcome at diagnosis are needed to improve management, and facilitate enrollment in clinical trials seeking to prevent blast crisis transformation and improve the depth of molecular responses. To this end, gene expression (GE) profiling studies have evaluated whether GE signatures at diagnosis are clinically informative. Patient material from a variety of sources has been profiled using microarrays, RNA sequencing and, more recently, single-cell RNA sequencing. However, differences in the cell types profiled, the technologies used, and the inherent complexities associated with the interpretation of genomic data pose challenges in distilling GE datasets into biomarkers with clinical utility. The goal of this paper is to review previous studies evaluating GE profiling in CML, and explore their potential as risk assessment tools for individualized CML treatment. We also review the contribution that acquired mutations, including those seen in clonal hematopoiesis, make to GE profiles, and how a model integrating contributions of genetic and epigenetic factors in resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and blast crisis transformation can define a route to GE-based biomarkers. Finally, we outline a four-stage approach for the development of GE-based biomarkers in CML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.