Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34615339›Full record

ReviewHaematologica2022

Integrating genetic and epigenetic factors in chronic myeloid leukemia risk assessment: toward gene expression-based biomarkers.

Vaidehi Krishnan, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim, Timothy P Hughes, Susan Branford, S Tiong Ong

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haematologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Vaidehi KrishnanCancer and Stem Cell Biology Signature Research Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore; International Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Foundation.
Dennis Dong Hwan KimInternational Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Foundation; Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto.
Timothy P HughesInternational Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Foundation; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Haematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide.
Susan BranfordInternational Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Foundation; School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Department of Genetics and Molecular Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia; School of Pharmacy and Medical Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide.
S Tiong OngCancer and Stem Cell Biology Signature Research Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore; International Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Foundation; Department of Haematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. sintiong.ong@duke-nus.edu.sg.
International Myeloma Foundation · USDuke Medical Center · USSouth Australia Pathology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer treatment is constantly evolving from a one-size-fits-all towards bespoke approaches for each patient. In certain solid cancers, including breast and lung, tumor genome profiling has been incorporated into therapeutic decision-making. For chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), while tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is the standard treatment, current clinical scoring systems cannot accurately predict the heterogeneous treatment outcomes observed in patients. Biomarkers capable of segregating patients according to outcome at diagnosis are needed to improve management, and facilitate enrollment in clinical trials seeking to prevent blast crisis transformation and improve the depth of molecular responses. To this end, gene expression (GE) profiling studies have evaluated whether GE signatures at diagnosis are clinically informative. Patient material from a variety of sources has been profiled using microarrays, RNA sequencing and, more recently, single-cell RNA sequencing. However, differences in the cell types profiled, the technologies used, and the inherent complexities associated with the interpretation of genomic data pose challenges in distilling GE datasets into biomarkers with clinical utility. The goal of this paper is to review previous studies evaluating GE profiling in CML, and explore their potential as risk assessment tools for individualized CML treatment. We also review the contribution that acquired mutations, including those seen in clonal hematopoiesis, make to GE profiles, and how a model integrating contributions of genetic and epigenetic factors in resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and blast crisis transformation can define a route to GE-based biomarkers. Finally, we outline a four-stage approach for the development of GE-based biomarkers in CML.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveBiomarkersBlast CrisisEpigenesis, GeneticGene ExpressionHumansProtein Kinase InhibitorsBiomarkersProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34615339
PMCPMC8804571
OpenAlexW3201791129

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.