Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34617407›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Integrated analysis of patients with KEAP1/NFE2L2/CUL3 mutations in lung adenocarcinomas.

Xing Jin, Yuansheng Zheng, Zhencong Chen, Fei Wang, Guoshu Bi, Ming Li, Jiaqi Liang, Qihai Sui, Yunyi Bian, Zhengyang Hu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xing JinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuansheng ZhengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhencong ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fei WangTaizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, Jiangsu, China.
Guoshu BiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ming LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jiaqi LiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qihai SuiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yunyi BianDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhengyang HuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yulei QiaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Songtao XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8869-5027
Fudan University · CNNantong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the clinical features, molecular characteristics, and immune landscape of lung adenocarcinoma patients with KEAP1/NFE2L2/CUL3 mutations.

methodsThe multi-omics data from the GDC-TCGA LUAD project of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were downloaded from the Xena browser. The estimate of the immune infiltration was implemented by using the GSVA analysis and CIBERSORT. The status of KEAP1/NFE2L2/CUL3 mutation in 50 LUAD samples of our department was detected by using Sanger sequencing, following the relative expression level of differentially expressed genes (DEGs), miRNAs (DEmiRNAs), and lncRNAs (DElncRNAs) was validated by IHC and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

resultsThe Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses demonstrated that KEAP1/NFE2L2/CUL3 mutations had independent prognostic value for OS and PFS in LUAD patients. The differential analysis detected 207 upregulated genes (like GSR/UGT1A6) and 447 downregulated genes (such as PIGR). GO, KEGG, and GSEA analyses demonstrated that DEGs were enriched in glutamate metabolism and the immune response. The constructed ceRNA network shows the linkage of differential lncRNAs and mRNAs. Three hundred and nine somatic mutations were detected, alterations in immune infiltration DNA methylations and stemness scores were also founded between the two groups. Eight mutated LUAD patients were detected by Sanger DNA sequencing in 50 surgical patients. GSR and UGT1A6 were validated to express higher in the Mut group, whereas the expression of PIGR was restrained. Furthermore, the IHC staining conducted on paraffin-embedded tissue emphasizes the consistency of our result.

conclusionThis research implemented the comprehensive analysis of KEAP1/NFE2L2/CUL3 somatic mutations in the LUAD patients. Compared with the wild type of LUAD patients, the Mut group shows a large difference in clinical features, RNA sequence, DNA methylation, and immune infiltrations, indicating complex mechanism oncogenesis and also reveals potential therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAgedBiomarkers, TumorCullin ProteinsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1MaleMiddle AgedMutationNF-E2-Related Factor 2Biomarkers, TumorCUL3 protein, humanCullin ProteinsKEAP1 protein, humanKelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1NFE2L2 protein, humanNF-E2-Related Factor 2cullin 3 (CUL3)kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1)lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD)mutationnuclear factor erythroid 2-like 2 (NFE2L2)

Identifiers

PMID34617407
PMCPMC8633244
OpenAlexW3203823733

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.