ArticlePloS one2021
Correspondence of aCGH and long-read genome assembly for detection of copy number differences: A proof-of-concept with cichlid genomes.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Copy number variation is an important source of genetic variation, yet data are often lacking due to technical limitations for detection given the current genome assemblies. Our goal is to demonstrate the extent to which an array-based platform (aCGH) can identify genomic loci that are collapsed in genome assemblies that were built with short-read technology. Taking advantage of two cichlid species for which genome assemblies based on Illumina and PacBio are available, we show that inter-species aCGH log2 hybridization ratios correlate more strongly with inferred copy number differences based on PacBio-built genome assemblies than based on Illumina-built genome assemblies. With regard to inter-species copy number differences of specific genes identified by each platform, the set identified by aCGH intersects to a greater extent with the set identified by PacBio than with the set identified by Illumina. Gene function, according to Gene Ontology analysis, did not substantially differ among platforms, and platforms converged on functions associated with adaptive phenotypes. The results of the current study further demonstrate that aCGH is an effective platform for identifying copy number variable sequences, particularly those collapsed in short read genome assemblies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.