Trial reportJournal of the American College of Cardiology2021
Comparative Reductions in Investigator-Reported and Adjudicated Ischemic Events in REDUCE-IT.
Trial report in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT01492361. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Effect of AMR101 on Cardiovascular Health and Mortality in Hypertriglyceridemic Patients With Cardiovascular Disease or at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: REDUCE-IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With EPA - Intervention Trial)
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Adjudicate Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Clinical Trials.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026Trial
- Reliability of major bleeding events in UK routine data versus clinical trial adjudicated follow-up data.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2023Trial
- Cardiovascular Benefits of Icosapent Ethyl in Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation in REDUCE-IT.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Trial
- Impact of acute coronary syndrome on clinical outcomes after revascularization with the dual-therapy CD34 antibody-covered sirolimus-eluting Combo stent and the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2023Trial
- Comparison of Investigator-Reported vs Centrally Adjudicated Major Adverse Cardiac Events: A Secondary Analysis of the COMPASS Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Impact of diabetes on clinical outcomes after revascularization with the dual therapy CD34 antibody-covered sirolimus-eluting Combo stent and the sirolimus-eluting Orsiro stent.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2022Trial
- Mechanisms, precision therapies, and technological frontiers in coronary atherosclerosis: a comprehensive review.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- The potential of artificial intelligence in clinical trials.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Confidence-linked and uncertainty-based staged framework for phenotype validation using large language models.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Incidence and 1-Year Prognostic of Unstable Angina After High-Sensitivity Troponin Assessment.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025Observational
- Effects of systematic cardiac rehabilitation training in elderly patients with unstable angina following cardiac stent implantation.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- Invasive Treatment Strategy in Adults With Frailty and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Fish and Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Sex and Racial Differences in Cardiovascular Outcomes and Cognitive Function.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2024Review
- A Critical Review of Icosapent Ethyl in Cardiovascular Risk Reduction.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2023Review
- Inclisiran and cardiovascular events: a patient-level analysis of phase III trials.European heart journal · 2023Article
- Review
- The potential population health impact of treating REDUCE-IT eligible US adults with Icosapent Ethyl.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2022Article
- Cost-effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl for High-risk Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia Despite Statin Treatment.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Unstable Angina as a Component of Primary Composite Endpoints in Clinical Cardiovascular Trials: Pros and Cons.Cardiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundREDUCE-IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial) randomized statin-treated patients with elevated triglycerides to icosapent ethyl (IPE) or placebo. There was a significant reduction in adjudicated events, including the primary endpoint (cardiovascular [CV] death, myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, coronary revascularization, unstable angina requiring hospitalization) and key secondary endpoint (CV death, MI, stroke) with IPE.
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the effects of IPE on investigator-reported events.
methodsPotential endpoints were collected by blinded site investigators and subsequently adjudicated by a blinded Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC) according to a prespecified charter. Investigator-reported events were compared with adjudicated events for concordance.
resultsThere was a high degree of concordance between investigator-reported and adjudicated endpoints. The simple Kappa statistic between CEC-adjudicated vs site-reported events for the primary endpoint was 0.89 and for the key secondary endpoint was 0.90. Based on investigator-reported events in 8,179 randomized patients, IPE significantly reduced the rate of the primary endpoint (19.1% vs 24.6%; HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.67-0.81]; P < 0.0001) and the key secondary endpoint (10.5% vs 13.6%; HR: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.66-0.85]; P < 0.0001). Among adjudicated events, IPE similarly reduced the rate of the primary and key secondary endpoints.
conclusionsIPE led to consistent, significant reductions in CV events, including MI and coronary revascularization, as determined by independent, blinded CEC adjudication as well as by blinded investigator-reported assessment. These results highlight the robust evidence for the substantial CV benefits of IPE seen in REDUCE-IT and further raise the question of whether adjudication of CV outcome trial endpoints is routinely required in blinded, placebo-controlled trials. (Evaluation of the Effect of AMR101 on Cardiovascular Health and Mortality in Hypertriglyceridemic Patients With Cardiovascular Disease or at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: REDUCE-IT [Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With EPA - Intervention Trial]; NCT01492361).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.