Evidence mapPaperPMID 34620628Full record

SynthesisCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2021

Effectiveness of Physical Activity Interventions among Rural Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Scherezade K Mama, Maria A Lopez-Olivo, Nishat Bhuiyan, Heather J Leach

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Scherezade K MamaDepartment of Health Disparities Research, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. skmama@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0003-1935-7707
Maria A Lopez-OlivoDepartment of Health Services Research, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-5165-8393
Nishat BhuiyanCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona.
Heather J LeachDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, College of Health and Human Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USArizona State University · USColorado State University · US

Funding

Protocol Review and Monitoring SystemP30CA016672 · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · 1985 to 2025
$57.3M
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA222335NCI NIH HHS K08 CA237619NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review estimated the effectiveness of behavior change interventions to increase physical activity (PA) among rural adult cancer survivors. PubMed Medline, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were systematically searched through July 2020. Two independent investigators screened citations to identify studies to increase PA in adults residing in rural areas who had received any cancer diagnosis. Meta-analyses were conducted to assess proportion of participants achieving PA goal, paired mean difference (MD) in aerobic PA and strength training, and retention from baseline to post-intervention. Seven studies met inclusion criteria encompassing a total of 722 participants (591 in intervention and 131 controls). Overall quality of evidence was low to medium. The pooled proportion of participants achieving PA goals (150-225 min/wk) was 39% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18%-62%]. The mean time spent engaging in aerobic PA increased from baseline to post-intervention (range, 6-52 weeks) by 97.7 min/wk (95% CI, 75.0-120.4), and the MD in time spent on strength training was 12.2 min/wk (95% CI, -8.3-32.8). The pooled retention rate was 82% (95% CI, 69%-92%) at 6 to 78 weeks. Because of the modest intervention effects, low quality of evidence, and small number of studies, further rigorously designed behavior change interventions, including randomized controlled trials with long-term follow up, are needed to confirm efficacy for increasing PA in rural cancer survivors and to test innovative implementation strategies to enhance reach and effectiveness.

Indexed as

ExerciseRural PopulationCancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansMalePatient ComplianceResistance Training

Identifiers

PMID34620628
PMCPMC8643319
OpenAlexW3204868218

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.