Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34629104›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2021

Efficacy of an exoskeleton-based physical therapy program for non-ambulatory patients during subacute stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial.

Dennis R Louie, W Ben Mortenson, Melanie Durocher, Amy Schneeberg, Robert Teasell, Jennifer Yao, Janice J Eng

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02995265 nacompletednot on this map

Use of a Robotic Exoskeleton to Promote Walking Recovery After Stroke - Phase 2

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2017 to 2020Enrolled36ConditionsConditionsArmsExoskeleton Program, Usual Care Program
NCT07023770 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Rehabilitation Program Dedicated to Post-stroke Lateropulsion Including Exoskeleton Assisted Exercises

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2025 to 2026Enrolled3ConditionsStroke, IschemicArmsspecific lateropulsion rehabilitation program (exoskeleton + specific physiotherapy orientation rehabilitation), Conventional physiotherapy without without exercises dedicated to lateropulsion or verticality representation alleviation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dennis R LouieDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
W Ben MortensonRehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Melanie DurocherGlenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Amy SchneebergRehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Robert TeasellParkwood Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, ON, Canada.
Jennifer YaoGF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Janice J EngDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. janice.eng@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2093-0788
Vancouver Coastal Health · CAAlberta Health Services · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

FUNCTION OF MUTANT MYOSIN IN HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHYF32HL009030 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LANKFORD, EDWARD B · 1994 to 1994
–
CIHR FDN 143340heart and stroke foundation of canada G-15-0009030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals requiring greater physical assistance to practice walking complete fewer steps in physical therapy during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Powered exoskeletons have been developed to allow repetitious overground gait training for individuals with lower limb weakness. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of exoskeleton-based physical therapy training during subacute rehabilitation for walking recovery in non-ambulatory patients with stroke.

methodsAn assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted at 3 inpatient rehabilitation hospitals. Patients with subacute stroke (< 3 months) who were unable to walk without substantial assistance (Functional Ambulation Category rating of 0 or 1) were randomly assigned to receive exoskeleton-based or standard physical therapy during rehabilitation, until discharge or a maximum of 8 weeks. The experimental protocol replaced 75% of standard physical therapy sessions with individualized exoskeleton-based sessions to increase standing and stepping repetition, with the possibility of weaning off the device. The primary outcome was walking ability, measured using the Functional Ambulation Category. Secondary outcomes were gait speed, distance walked on the 6-Minute Walk Test, days to achieve unassisted gait, lower extremity motor function (Fugl-Meyer Assessment), Berg Balance Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and 36-Item Short Form Survey, measured post-intervention and after 6 months.

resultsThirty-six patients with stroke (mean 39 days post-stroke) were randomized (Exoskeleton = 19, Usual Care = 17). On intention-to-treat analysis, no significant between-group differences were found in the primary or secondary outcomes at post-intervention or after 6 months. Five participants randomized to the Exoskeleton group did not receive the protocol as planned and thus exploratory as-treated and per-protocol analyses were undertaken. The as-treated analysis found that those adhering to exoskeleton-based physical therapy regained independent walking earlier (p = 0.03) and had greater gait speed (p = 0.04) and 6MWT (p = 0.03) at 6 months; however, these differences were not significant in the per-protocol analysis. No serious adverse events were reported.

conclusionsThis study found that exoskeleton-based physical therapy does not result in greater improvements in walking independence than standard care but can be safely administered at no detriment to patient outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration The Exoskeleton for post-Stroke Recovery of Ambulation (ExStRA) trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02995265, first registered: December 16, 2016).

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceGait Disorders, NeurologicStroke RehabilitationExercise TherapyHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTreatment OutcomeWalkingClinical trialExoskeletonPhysical therapy techniquesRehabilitationStrokeWalking

Identifiers

PMID34629104
PMCPMC8502504
OpenAlexW3206859706

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.