Evidence mapPaperPMID 34646959Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2021

Evaluation of the impact of gastric bypass surgery on eating behaviour using objective methodologies under residential conditions: Rationale and study protocol.

Tamsyn Redpath, Fathimath Naseer, Ruth Karen Price, Adele Boyd, Melanie Martin, Carel Wynand le Roux, Alan C Spector, Margaret Barbara Elizabeth Livingstone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Tamsyn RedpathNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, United Kingdom.
Fathimath NaseerNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, United Kingdom.
Ruth Karen PriceNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, United Kingdom.
Adele BoydNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, United Kingdom.
Melanie MartinNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, United Kingdom.
Carel Wynand le RouxDiabetes Complications Research Centre, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Alan C SpectorDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Margaret Barbara Elizabeth LivingstoneNutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, United Kingdom.
University of Ulster · GBFlorida State University · USUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_16017NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK106112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric bypass surgery leads to significant and sustained weight loss and a reduction in associated health risks in individuals with severe obesity. While reduced energy intake (EI) is the primary driver of weight loss following surgery, the underlying mechanisms accounting for this energy deficit are not well understood. The evidence base has been constrained by a lack of fit-for-purpose methodology in assessing food intake coupled with follow-up studies that are relatively short-term. This paper describes the underlying rationale and protocol for an observational, fully residential study using covert, objective methodology to evaluate changes in 24-hr food intake in patients (n = 31) at 1-month pre-surgery and 3-, 12- and 24-months post-surgery, compared to weight-stable controls (n = 32). The main study endpoints included change in EI, macronutrient intake, food preferences, and eating behaviours (speed, frequency, and duration of eating). Other physiological changes that may influence EI and weight regulation including changes in body composition, circulating appetite hormones, resting metabolic rate, total energy expenditure and gastrointestinal symptoms were also evaluated. Understanding which mechanisms contribute to a reduction in EI and weight loss post-surgery could potentially help to identify those individuals who are most likely to benefit from gastric bypass surgery as well as those that may need more targeted intervention to optimise their weight loss post-surgery. Furthermore, clarification of these mechanisms may also inform targeted approaches for non-surgical treatments of obesity.

Indexed as

Food intakeGastric bypassObjective validationStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID34646959
PMCPMC8497851
OpenAlexW3197950969

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.