Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34665376›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2022

Fast-slow analysis as a technique for understanding the neuronal response to current ramps.

Kelsey Gasior, Kirill Korshunov, Paul Q Trombley, Richard Bertram

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelsey GasiorDepartment of Mathematics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Kirill KorshunovDepartment of Biological Science and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.
Paul Q TrombleyDepartment of Biological Science and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.
Richard BertramDepartment of Mathematics and Programs in Neuroscience and Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA. rbertram@fsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8577-2592
Florida State University · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

Chemosensory Training Program (CTP)T32DC000044 · NIDCD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DEBRA Ann FADOOL · 1995 to 2026
$5.3M
Microfluidic System for Monitoring Gliotransmitter ReleaseR21DA044442 · NIDA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BERTRAM, RICHARD, ROPER, MICHAEL GABRIEL · 2018 to 2019
$352k
National Science Foundation DMS1853342NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA044442NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard protocol for studying the spiking properties of single neurons is the application of current steps while monitoring the voltage response. Although this is informative, the jump in applied current is artificial. A more physiological input is where the applied current is ramped up, reflecting chemosensory input. Unsurprisingly, neurons can respond differently to the two protocols, since ion channel activation and inactivation are affected differently. Understanding the effects of current ramps, and changes in their slopes, is facilitated by mathematical models. However, techniques for analyzing current ramps are under-developed. In this article, we demonstrate how current ramps can be analyzed in single neuron models. The primary issue is the presence of gating variables that activate on slow time scales and are therefore far from equilibrium throughout the ramp. The use of an appropriate fast-slow analysis technique allows one to fully understand the neural response to ramps of different slopes. This study is motivated by data from olfactory bulb dopamine neurons, where both fast ramp (tens of milliseconds) and slow ramp (tens of seconds) protocols are used to understand the spiking profiles of the cells. The slow ramps generate experimental bifurcation diagrams with the applied current as a bifurcation parameter, thereby establishing asymptotic spiking activity patterns. The faster ramps elicit purely transient behavior that is of relevance to most physiological inputs, which are short in duration. The two protocols together provide a broader understanding of the neuron's spiking profile and the role that slowly activating ion channels can play.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeuronsIon ChannelsMembrane PotentialsIon ChannelsFast-slow analysisMultiscale systemSingle cell

Identifiers

PMID34665376
PMCPMC9016091
OpenAlexW3207087726

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.