Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34676935›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2022

Population genomic, olfactory, dietary, and gut microbiota analyses demonstrate the unique evolutionary trajectory of feral pigs.

Simona Petrelli, Maria Buglione, Valeria Maselli, Claudia Troiano, Greger Larson, Laurent Frantz, Aurelie Manin, Ezio Ricca, Loredana Baccigalupi, Dominic Wright and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Microbial genomics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Simona PetrelliDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2862-1397
Maria BuglioneDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6022-707X
Valeria MaselliDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1452-8063
Claudia TroianoDepartment of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2448-2721
Greger LarsonThe Palaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4092-0392
Laurent FrantzSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8030-3885
Aurelie ManinThe Palaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1061-3754
Ezio RiccaDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7355-0332
Loredana BaccigalupiTask Force on Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3070-161X
Dominic WrightIFM Biology, AVIAN Behavioural Genomics and Physiology Group, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2329-2635
Christian PietriFédération Départementale des Chasseurs de Haute-Corse (FDCHC), Résidence Nouvelle-Corniche, St Joseph, Bastia, France.
Domenico FulgioneDepartment of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5121-3298
University of Naples Federico II · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Oxford · GBDélégation Régionale Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur et Corse · FRLinköping University · SEQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

European Research Council ERC-2013-StG-337574-UNDEADEuropean Research Council ERC-2019-StG-853272-PALAEOFARMNatural Environmental Research Council NE/K003259/1Natural Environmental Research Council NE/K005243/1Natural Environmental Research Council NE/S007067/1Natural Environment Research Council NE/S00078X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domestication is an intriguing evolutionary process. Many domestic populations are subjected to strong human-mediated selection, and when some individuals return to the wild, they are again subjected to selective forces associated with new environments. Generally, these feral populations evolve into something different from their wild predecessors and their members typically possess a combination of both wild and human selected traits. Feralisation can manifest in different forms on a spectrum from a wild to a domestic phenotype. This depends on how the rewilded domesticated populations can readapt to natural environments based on how much potential and flexibility the ancestral genome retains after its domestication signature. Whether feralisation leads to the evolution of new traits that do not exist in the wild or to convergence with wild forms, however, remains unclear. To address this question, we performed population genomic, olfactory, dietary, and gut microbiota analyses on different populations of Sus scrofa (wild boar, hybrid, feral and several domestic pig breeds). Porcine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) analysis shows that the feral population represents a cluster distinctly separate from all others. Its members display signatures of past artificial selection, as demonstrated by values of F

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBreedingDietMetagenomicsSus scrofaSwinedietferalisationgut microbiotaolfactionpopulation genomicsSus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID34676935
PMCPMC11497273
OpenAlexW3207157913

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.