Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34677272›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

Considerations for Developing a Reassessment Process: Report from the Canadian Real-World Evidence for Value of Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration's Reassessment and Uptake Working Group.

Wei Fang Dai, Vanessa Arciero, Erica Craig, Brent Fraser, Jessica Arias, Darryl Boehm, Nevzeta Bosnic, Patricia Caetano, Carole Chambers, Barry Jones and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Access to Cancer Drugs in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Wei Fang DaiTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Vanessa ArcieroTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
Erica CraigNew Brunswick Cancer Network, Saint John, NB E2J 3S4, Canada.
Brent FraserCanadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa, ON K1S 5S8, Canada.
Jessica AriasOntario Health (CCO), Toronto, ON M5G 2L7, Canada.
Darryl BoehmSaskatchewan Cancer Agency, Regina, SK S4W 0G3, Canada.
Nevzeta BosnicPatented Medicine Prices Review Board, Ottawa, ON K1P 1C1, Canada.
Patricia CaetanoGovernment of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3B 3M9, Canada.
Carole ChambersAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5J 3E4, Canada.
Barry JonesHealth Canada, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4X2, Canada.
Elena LunguPatented Medicine Prices Review Board, Ottawa, ON K1P 1C1, Canada.
Gunita MiteraCanadian Association of Provincial Cancer Agencies, Toronto, ON M5H 1J9, Canada.
Tanya PotashnikPatented Medicine Prices Review Board, Ottawa, ON K1P 1C1, Canada.
Anthony ReimanDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Trevor RitcherCanadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, Ottawa, ON K1S 5S8, Canada.
Jaclyn M BecaCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, ON M5G 2L3, Canada.
Avram DenburgThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0039-0742
Rebecca E MercerCanadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, ON M5G 2L3, Canada.
Ambica ParmarSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Mina TadrousWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1911-6129
Pam TakharOntario Health (CCO), Toronto, ON M5G 2L7, Canada.
Kelvin K W ChanTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada.
On Behalf Of The CanREValue Collaboration Reassessment And Uptake Working Group
Public Health Ontario · CACanadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAAlberta Health Services · CAGovernment of Manitoba · CAHealth Canada · CAHospital for Sick Children · CASaskatchewan Cancer Agency · CAUniversity of New Brunswick · CAWomen's College Hospital · CA

Funding

CIHR HRC-154126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Canadian Real-world Evidence for Value in Cancer Drugs (CanREValue) Collaboration was established to develop a framework for generating and using real-world evidence (RWE) to inform the reassessment of cancer drugs following initial health technology assessment (HTA). The Reassessment and Uptake Working Group (RWG) is one of the five established CanREValue Working Groups. The RWG aims to develop considerations for incorporating RWE for HTA reassessment and strategies for using RWE to reassess drug funding decisions. Between February 2018 and December 2019, the RWG attended four teleconferences (with follow-up surveys) and two in-person meetings to discuss recommendations for the development of a reassessment process and potential barriers and facilitators. Modified Delphi methods were used to gather input. A draft report of recommendations (to December 2018) was shared for public consultation (December 2019 to January 2020). Initial considerations for developing a reassessment process were proposed. Specifically, reassessment can be initiated by diverse stakeholders, including decision makers from public drug plans or industry stakeholders. The reassessment process should be modelled after existing deliberation and recommendation frameworks used by HTA agencies. Proposed reassessment outcome categories include maintaining status quo, revisiting funding criteria, renegotiating price, or disinvesting. Overall, these initial considerations will serve as the basis for future advancements by the Collaboration.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsCanadaHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalAntineoplastic Agentshealth technology assessmentreal-world evidencereassessment

Identifiers

PMID34677272
PMCPMC8534602
OpenAlexW3206628718

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.