Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34677748›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

Can machine learning-based analysis of multiparameter MRI and clinical parameters improve the performance of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis?

Tao Peng, JianMing Xiao, Lin Li, BingJie Pu, XiangKe Niu, XiaoHui Zeng, ZongYong Wang, ChaoBang Gao, Ci Li, Lin Chen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tao PengDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, 82 2nd N Section of Second Ring Rd, Chengdu, 610081, Sichuan Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4307-2309
JianMing XiaoDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, 82 2nd N Section of Second Ring Rd, Chengdu, 610081, Sichuan Province, China.
Lin LiDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, 82 2nd N Section of Second Ring Rd, Chengdu, 610081, Sichuan Province, China.
BingJie PuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, 82 2nd N Section of Second Ring Rd, Chengdu, 610081, Sichuan Province, China.
XiangKe NiuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, 82 2nd N Section of Second Ring Rd, Chengdu, 610081, Sichuan Province, China. article2020919@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7025-7587
XiaoHui ZengDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, 82 2nd N Section of Second Ring Rd, Chengdu, 610081, Sichuan Province, China.
ZongYong WangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, 82 2nd N Section of Second Ring Rd, Chengdu, 610081, Sichuan Province, China.
ChaoBang GaoCollege of Information Science and Technology, Chengdu University, 1 Shiling shang Street, Chengdu, 610106, Sichuan Province, China.
Ci LiDepartment of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, 82 2nd N Section of Second Ring Rd, Chengdu, 610081, Sichuan Province, China.
Lin ChenDepartment of Urology Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, 82 2nd N Section of Second Ring Rd, Chengdu, 610081, Sichuan Province, China.
Jin YangDepartment of Urology Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, 82 2nd N Section of Second Ring Rd, Chengdu, 610081, Sichuan Province, China.

Funding

Health and Family Planning Commission of Chengdu City 2018055Health and Family Planning Commission of Sichuan Province 17PJ430Health and Family Planning Commission of Sichuan Province 18PJ150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo establish machine learning(ML) models for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) using multiparameter magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), texture analysis (TA), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) quantitative analysis and clinical parameters and to evaluate the stability of these models in internal and temporal validation.

methodsThe dataset of 194 men was split into training (n = 135) and internal validation (n = 59) cohorts, and a temporal dataset (n = 58) was used for evaluation. The lesions with Gleason score ≥ 7 were defined as csPC. Logistic regression (LR), stepwise regression (SR), classical decision tree (cDT), conditional inference tree (CIT), random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) models were established by combining mpMRI-TA, DCE-MRI and clinical parameters and validated by internal and temporal validation using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Delong's method.

resultsEight variables were determined as important predictors for csPC, with the first three related to texture features derived from the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping. RF, LR and SR models yielded larger and more stable area under the ROC curve values (AUCs) than other models. In the temporal validation, the sensitivity was lower than that of the internal validation (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and AUC (p > 0.05).

conclusionsEach machine learning model in this study has good classification ability for csPC. Compared with internal validation, the sensitivity of each machine learning model in temporal validation was reduced, but the specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV and AUCs remained stable at a good level. The RF, LR and SR models have better classification performance in the imaging-based diagnosis of csPC, and ADC texture-related parameters are of the highest importance.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMachine LearningMaleRetrospective StudiesClassificationMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancerRadiomicsTexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID34677748
PMCPMC8616865

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.