Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34684556›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2021

A Systematic Review of Diet Quality Index and Obesity among Chinese Adults.

Isma'il Kadam, Sudeep Neupane, Jingkai Wei, Lee Ann Fullington, Tricia Li, Ruopeng An, Li Zhao, Amy Ellithorpe, Xinyin Jiang, Liang Wang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07163455 (Time-Restricted Eating), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07163455 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Time-Restricted Eating (10-Hour Window) for Weight-Loss Maintenance in Adults With Recent Intentional Weight Loss: A Multicenter, 12-Month Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHarbin Medical UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled500ConditionsOverweight or Obese AdultsArmsScheduled Weight Maintenance Nutrition Education, Time-Restricted Eating (10-Hour Window)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Isma'il KadamProgram in Biochemistry, Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5189-058X
Sudeep NeupaneDepartment of Public Health, Robbins College of Human Health and Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76711, USA.
Jingkai WeiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Lee Ann FullingtonLibrary Department, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA.
Tricia LiDepartment of Public Health, Robbins College of Human Health and Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76711, USA.
Ruopeng AnBrown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Li ZhaoWest China Fourth Hospital, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Amy EllithorpeDepartment of Health and Nutrition Sciences, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA.
Xinyin JiangProgram in Biochemistry, Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6090-371X
Liang WangDepartment of Public Health, Robbins College of Human Health and Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76711, USA.
Baylor University · USCity University of New York · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · USSichuan University · CNUniversity of South Carolina · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diet quality scores are designed mainly based on Western-style dietary patterns. They were demonstrated to be good indicators of obesity in developed but not developing countries. Several diet quality scores were developed based on the Chinese dietary guidelines, yet no systematic review exists regarding how they were related to obesity. We searched research articles published between 2000 and 2021 in PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases. Both cross-sectional and prospective studies that examined the relationship between a diet quality score and weight, body mass index, obesity, or waist circumference conducted in a Chinese population were selected. From the 602 articles searched, 20 articles were selected (12 are cross-sectional studies and 8 are prospective cohort studies). The relationship between internationally used scores and obesity was inconsistent among studies. Scores tailored to the Chinese diet demonstrated a strong relationship with both being underweight and obesity. The heterogeneity of the populations and the major nutrition transition in China may partially explain the discrepancies among studies. In conclusion, diet quality scores tailored to the Chinese diet may be associated with both undernutrition and overnutrition, as well as being underweight and obesity outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAsian PeopleBody Mass IndexCase-Control StudiesChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, HealthyFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedObesityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung Adultbody weightChinesediet qualityobesity

Identifiers

PMID34684556
PMCPMC8538294
OpenAlexW3207956026

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.