Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34686003›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Potential of Essential Oils from Anise, Dill and Fennel Seeds for the Gypsy Moth Control.

Igor Kostić, Jelica Lazarević, Darka Šešlija Jovanović, Miroslav Kostić, Tatjana Marković, Slobodan Milanović

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Anise (Frontiers in insect science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Preservative Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Emerging Biopharmaceuticals fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Phytochemical Profile ofVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Insects · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Igor KostićInstitute for Multidisciplinary Research, University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava 1, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-8414-3791
Jelica LazarevićInstitute for Biological Research "Siniša Stanković"-National Institute of Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-7026-9385
Darka Šešlija JovanovićInstitute for Biological Research "Siniša Stanković"-National Institute of Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-3031-8426
Miroslav KostićInstitute for Medicinal Plant Research "Dr Josif Pančić", Tadeuša Košćuška 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Tatjana MarkovićInstitute for Medicinal Plant Research "Dr Josif Pančić", Tadeuša Košćuška 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-1328-6223
Slobodan MilanovićFaculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava 1, 11030 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-8260-999X
University of Belgrade · RSInstitute for Plant Protection and Environment · RS

Funding

Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia 451-03-9/2021-14/200007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gypsy moth (

Indexed as

botanical insecticidedeterrence coefficientdigestive toxicityinsect pest managementnutritional indices

Identifiers

PMID34686003
PMCPMC8538750
OpenAlexW3205833415

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.