SynthesisAmerican journal of preventive medicine2022
Systematic Review of Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring With Support: Intervention Effectiveness and Cost.
Synthesis in American journal of preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Standard vs Enhanced Self-measurement of Blood Pressure Paired With a Connected Smartphone Application: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2022Trial
- Program cost and return on investment analysis of remote patient monitoring for hypertension management in the cardiology department of a large healthcare system.Journal of telemedicine and telecare · 2026Article
- Improving Blood Pressure Control Through Standardization of Workflow in Outpatient Internal Medicine Clinics.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Self-measured blood pressure service and device use increased among Medicaid enrollees from 2018-2022.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure in Yemen: Preliminary Insights Into Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Hypertensive Patients.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Article
- Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring in Primary Care: Retrospective Analysis from a Large US Healthcare System.Clinical epidemiology · 2025Article
- implementation of healthy heart ambassador to improve blood pressure control at community health centers in Texas.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- TEXT MY BP MEDS NOLA: A pilot study of text-messaging and social support to increase hypertension medication adherence.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSelf-measured blood pressure monitoring with support is an evidence-based intervention that helps patients control their blood pressure. This systematic economic review describes how certain intervention aspects contribute to effectiveness, intervention cost, and intervention cost per unit of the effectiveness of self-measured blood pressure monitoring with support.
methodsPapers published between data inception and March 2021 were identified from a database search and manual searches. Papers were included if they focused on self-measured blood pressure monitoring with support and reported blood pressure change and intervention cost. Papers focused on preeclampsia, kidney disease, or drug efficacy were excluded. Quality of estimates was assessed for effectiveness, cost, and cost per unit of effectiveness. Patient characteristics and intervention features were analyzed in 2021 to determine how they impacted effectiveness, intervention cost, and intervention cost per unit of effectiveness.
resultsA total of 22 studies were included in this review from papers identified in the search. Type of support was not associated with differences in cost and cost per unit of effectiveness. Lower cost and cost per unit of effectiveness were achieved with simple technologies such as interactive phone systems, smartphones, and websites and where providers interacted with patients only as needed. DISCUSSION: Some of the included studies provided only limited information on key outcomes of interest to this review. However, the strength of this review is the systematic collection and synthesis of evidence that revealed the associations between the characteristics of implemented interventions and their patients and the interventions' effectiveness and cost, a useful contribution to the fields of both research and implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.