Trial reportThe Lancet. Neurology2021
Safety and efficacy of losartan for the reduction of brain atrophy in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease (the RADAR trial): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes of antihypertensive medication use in people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.GeroScience · 2026Pooled it
- Calcium dysregulation in neurovascular function in Alzheimer's disease: mechanisms, therapeutic targets.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Risks of dementia and stroke in patients with hypertension using telmisartan or other renin‑angiotensin system inhibitors.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Artificial neural networks fighting real neural decline: a systematic review of AI in Alzheimer's research.Artificial intelligence review · 2026Article
- Identifying synergistic combinations of repurposed treatments for Alzheimer's Disease.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Exacerbates Thromboembolic Cerebrovascular Complications in Humanized ACE2 Mouse Model.Translational stroke research · 2025Article
- What Information do Systemic Pathological Changes Bring to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease?Neuroscience bulletin · 2025Review
- Review
- Interplay Between Vascular Dysfunction and Neurodegenerative Pathology: New Insights into Molecular Mechanisms and Management.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Mechanisms to medicines: navigating drug repurposing strategies in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
- Advantages and challenges of using arterial spin labelling MRI to monitor cerebral blood flow in multi-centre clinical trials of neurodegenerative disease: Experience from the RADAR study.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2025Article
- The Contribution of the Renin-Angiotensin System to Alzheimer's Disease.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025Review
- Exploring the role of insulin resistance in bridging the metabolic syndrome and Alzheimer's disease-a review of mechanistic studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Downregulation of miR-181c-5p in Alzheimer's disease weakens the response of microglia to Aβ phagocytosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Leveraging generative AI to prioritize drug repurposing candidates for Alzheimer's disease with real-world clinical validation.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- The Role of Furin in the Pathogenesis of COVID-19-Associated Neurological Disorders.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Consistency between Treatment Effects on Clinical and Brain Atrophy Outcomes in Alzheimer's Disease Trials.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024Article
- Conventional follicular-phase ovarian stimulation vs. luteal-phase stimulation in suboptimal responders: a randomized controlled trial.F&S reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrugs modifying angiotensin II signalling could reduce Alzheimer's disease pathology, thus decreasing the rate of disease progression. We investigated whether the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan, compared with placebo, could reduce brain volume loss, as a measure of disease progression, in clinically diagnosed mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease.
methodsIn this double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, eligible patients aged 55 years or older, previously untreated with angiotensin II drugs and diagnosed (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria) with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease, and who had capacity to consent, were recruited from 23 UK National Health Service hospital trusts. After undergoing a 4-week, open-label phase of active treatment then washout, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) oral over-encapsulated preparations of either 100 mg losartan (after an initial two-dose titration stage) or matched placebo daily for 12 months. Randomisation, minimised by age and baseline medial temporal lobe atrophy score, was undertaken online or via pin-access service by telephone. Participants, their study companions, and study personnel were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome, analysed by the intention-to-treat principle (ie, participants analysed in the group to which they were randomised, without imputation for missing data), was change in whole brain volume between baseline and 12 months, measured using volumetric MRI and determined by boundary shift interval (BSI) analysis. The trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register (ISRCTN93682878) and the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2012-003641-15), and is completed.
findingsBetween July 22, 2014, and May 17, 2018, 261 participants entered the open-label phase. 211 were randomly assigned losartan (n=105) or placebo (n=106). Of 197 (93%) participants who completed the study, 171 (81%) had complete primary outcome data. The mean brain volume (BSI) reduction was 19·1 mL (SD 10·3) in the losartan group and 20·0 mL (10·8) in the placebo group. The difference in total volume reduction between groups was -2·29 mL (95% CI -6·46 to 0·89; p=0·14). The number of adverse events was low (22 in the losartan group and 20 in the placebo group) with no differences between treatment groups. There was one treatment-related death per treatment group.
interpretation12 months of treatment with losartan was well tolerated but was not effective in reducing the rate of brain atrophy in individuals with clinically diagnosed mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. Further research is needed to assess the potential therapeutic benefit from earlier treatment in patients with milder cognitive impairment or from longer treatment periods.
fundingEfficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme (UK Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.