Evidence mapPaperPMID 34690688Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2021

New and Emerging Approaches to Better Define Sleep Disruption and Its Consequences.

Bastien Lechat, Hannah Scott, Ganesh Naik, Kristy Hansen, Duc Phuc Nguyen, Andrew Vakulin, Peter Catcheside, Danny J Eckert

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of using AI-enabled technology in sleep medicine: a commentary.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Multinight Prevalence, Variability, and Diagnostic Misclassification of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bastien LechatAdelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Hannah ScottAdelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Ganesh NaikAdelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Kristy HansenAdelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Duc Phuc NguyenAdelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Andrew VakulinAdelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Peter CatchesideAdelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Danny J EckertAdelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current approaches to quantify and diagnose sleep disorders and circadian rhythm disruption are imprecise, laborious, and often do not relate well to key clinical and health outcomes. Newer emerging approaches that aim to overcome the practical and technical constraints of current sleep metrics have considerable potential to better explain sleep disorder pathophysiology and thus to more precisely align diagnostic, treatment and management approaches to underlying pathology. These include more fine-grained and continuous EEG signal feature detection and novel oxygenation metrics to better encapsulate hypoxia duration, frequency, and magnitude readily possible via more advanced data acquisition and scoring algorithm approaches. Recent technological advances may also soon facilitate simple assessment of circadian rhythm physiology at home to enable sleep disorder diagnostics even for "non-circadian rhythm" sleep disorders, such as chronic insomnia and sleep apnea, which in many cases also include a circadian disruption component. Bringing these novel approaches into the clinic and the home settings should be a priority for the field. Modern sleep tracking technology can also further facilitate the transition of sleep diagnostics from the laboratory to the home, where environmental factors such as noise and light could usefully inform clinical decision-making. The "endpoint" of these new and emerging assessments will be better targeted therapies that directly address underlying sleep disorder pathophysiology via an individualized, precision medicine approach. This review outlines the current state-of-the-art in sleep and circadian monitoring and diagnostics and covers several new and emerging approaches to better define sleep disruption and its consequences.

Indexed as

apnea/hypopnea indexcircadian rhythminsomniapolysomnographyprecision medicinesignal processingsleep apneasleep disordered breathing

Identifiers

PMID34690688
PMCPMC8530106

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.