ArticleBiomedical optics express2021
Three-dimensional localization refinement and motion model parameter estimation for confined single particle tracking under low-light conditions.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional localization refinement and motion model parameter estimation for confined single particle tracking under low-light conditions.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Confined diffusion is an important model for describing the motion of biological macromolecules moving in the crowded, three-dimensional environment of the cell. In this work we build upon the technique known as sequential Monte Carlo - expectation maximization (SMC-EM) to simultaneously localize the particle and estimate the motion model parameters from single particle tracking data. We extend SMC-EM to handle the double-helix point spread function (DH-PSF) for encoding the three-dimensional position of the particle in the two-dimensional image plane of the camera. SMC-EM can handle a wide range of camera models and here we assume the data was acquired using a scientific CMOS (sCMOS) camera. The sensitivity and speed of these cameras make them well suited for SPT, though the pixel-dependent nature of the camera noise presents a challenge for analysis. We focus on the low signal setting and compare our method through simulation to more standard approaches that use the paradigm of localize-then-estimate. To localize the particle under the standard paradigm, we use both a Gaussian fit and a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) that accounts for both the DH-PSF and the pixel-dependent noise of the camera. Model estimation is then carried out either by fitting the model to the mean squared displacement (MSD) curve, or through an optimal estimation approach. Our results indicate that in the low signal regime, the SMC-EM approach outperforms the other methods while at higher signal-to-background levels, SMC-EM and the MLE-based methods perform equally well and both are significantly better than fitting to the MSD. In addition our results indicate that at smaller confinement lengths where the nonlinearities dominate the motion model, the SMC-EM approach is superior to the alternative approaches.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.