Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34693370›Full record

ReviewPatterns (New York, N.Y.)2021

Machine learning applications for therapeutic tasks with genomics data.

Kexin Huang, Cao Xiao, Lucas M Glass, Cathy W Critchlow, Greg Gibson, Jimeng Sun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Biological data studies, scale-up the potential with machine learning.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kexin HuangDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Cao XiaoAmplitude, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.
Lucas M GlassAnalytics Center of Excellence, IQVIA, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Cathy W CritchlowCenter for Observational Research, Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, USA.
Greg GibsonCenter for Integrative Genomics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Jimeng SunComputer Science Department and Carle's Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61820, USA.

Funding

Big Data and Deep Learning for the Interictal-Ictal-Injury ContiuumR01NS107291 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WESTOVER, MICHAEL BRANDON · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS107291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thanks to the increasing availability of genomics and other biomedical data, many machine learning algorithms have been proposed for a wide range of therapeutic discovery and development tasks. In this survey, we review the literature on machine learning applications for genomics through the lens of therapeutic development. We investigate the interplay among genomics, compounds, proteins, electronic health records, cellular images, and clinical texts. We identify 22 machine learning in genomics applications that span the whole therapeutics pipeline, from discovering novel targets, personalizing medicine, developing gene-editing tools, all the way to facilitating clinical trials and post-market studies. We also pinpoint seven key challenges in this field with potentials for expansion and impact. This survey examines recent research at the intersection of machine learning, genomics, and therapeutic development.

Indexed as

genomicsmachine learningtherapeutics discovery and development

Identifiers

PMID34693370
PMCPMC8515011

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.