ReviewBMJ open gastroenterology2021
The Newcastle ENDOPREM™: a validated patient reported experience measure for gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Review in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07699731 (The Effect of Pre-procedural Anxiety Level on Procedure Tolerability and Quality of ERCP in Consciously Sedated Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Pre-procedural Anxiety Level on Procedure Tolerability and Quality of ERCP in Consciously Sedated Patients
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of digital health interventions on patient satisfaction in outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Factors influencing the patient experience of gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasound: a Swedish cross-sectional study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Patient-reported tolerability of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using conscious sedation in patients with underlying depression and anxiety.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Observational
- First-in-human European experience with novel 22-G end-cutting fine-needle biopsy system: a prospective observational pilot study.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Patient-reported experience in device-assisted enteroscopy: Conscious sedation vs. general anesthesia.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Psychometric Evaluation of the Patient Experience Colonoscopy Scale.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- The Endoscopic Management of Zenker's Diverticulum: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Development and content validity testing of a colonoscopy-specific patient-reported experience measure: the Patient Experience Colonoscopy Scale (PECS).Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Article
- Patient experiences of Cytosponge: a qualitative study.Frontline gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Randomised controlled trials of non-pharmacological interventions to improve patient-reported outcomes of colonoscopy: a scoping review.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Measuring patient experience of Cytosponge using the Newcastle ENDOPREM.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- UK ERCP sedation practices, patient comfort and endoscopist characteristics: National Endoscopy Database (NED) analysis on behalf of the JAG and BSG.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: how low can we go?Frontline gastroenterology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMeasuring patient experience of gastrointestinal (GI) procedures is a key component of evaluation of quality of care. Current measures of patient experience within GI endoscopy are largely clinician derived and measured; however, these do not fully represent the experiences of patients themselves. It is important to measure the entirety of experience and not just experience directly during the procedure. We aimed to develop a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for GI procedures.
designPhase 1: semi-structured interviews were conducted in patients who had recently undergone GI endoscopy or CT colonography (CTC) (included as a comparator). Thematic analysis identified the aspects of experience important to patients. Phase 2: a question bank was developed from phase 1 findings, and iteratively refined through rounds of cognitive interviews with patients who had undergone GI procedures, resulting in a pilot PREM. Phase 3: patients who had attended for GI endoscopy or CTC were invited to complete the PREM. Psychometric properties were investigated. Phase 4 involved item reduction and refinement.
resultsPhase 1: interviews with 35 patients identified six overarching themes: anxiety, expectations, information & communication, embarrassment & dignity, choice & control and comfort. Phase 2: cognitive interviews refined questionnaire items and response options. Phase 3: the PREM was distributed to 1650 patients with 799 completing (48%). Psychometric properties were found to be robust. Phase 4: final questionnaire refined including 54 questions assessing patient experience across five temporal procedural stages.
conclusionThis manuscript gives an overview of the development and validation of the Newcastle ENDOPREM™, which assesses all aspects of the GI procedure experience from the patient perspective. It may be used to measure patient experience in clinical care and, in research, to compare patients' experiences of different endoscopic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.