Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34697131›Full record

ReviewIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Screening Tools for Sarcopenia.

Hiroki Nishikawa, Akira Asai, Shinya Fukunishi, Toshihisa Takeuchi, Masahiro Goto, Takeshi Ogura, Shiro Nakamura, Kazuki Kakimoto, Takako Miyazaki, Shuhei Nishiguchi and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frailty in COPD: Clinical Impact, Diagnosis, Biomarkers, and Management Strategies.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Unravelling the Complexity of Sarcopenia Through a Systems Biology Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroki NishikawaThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan; nishikawa_6392_0207@yahoo.co.jp.
Akira AsaiThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Shinya FukunishiThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Toshihisa TakeuchiThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Masahiro GotoThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Takeshi OguraThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Shiro NakamuraThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Kazuki KakimotoThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Takako MiyazakiThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Shuhei NishiguchiKano General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuhide HiguchiThe Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan.
Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences · JPOsaka City General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The elderly people are characterized by multiple comorbidities, dementia, and are at risk of developing sarcopenia and frailty. Sarcopenia is defined by loss of muscle mass and muscle strength or physical decline. Sarcopenia is a main component of physical frailty. Screening tools for sarcopenia that can be easily determined in daily practice are useful and include the SARC-F screening tool. SARC-F is a questionnaire consisting of five questions: Strength (S), Assistance walking (A), Rising from a chair (R), Climbing stairs (C), and Falls (F) on a scale of 0 to 2. The recommended cutoff value is ≥4 points. The SARC-F has been shown to correlate well with clinical outcomes in the elderly and various underlying diseases, while it is also true that the SARC-F has its shortcomings such as low sensitivity for sarcopenia. In this review, we mainly outline the SARC-F and mention other screening tools for sarcopenia.

Indexed as

SarcopeniaAgedCross-Sectional StudiesGeriatric AssessmentHumansMass ScreeningSurveys and QuestionnairesreviewSARC-FSarcopeniascreening toolsensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID34697131
PMCPMC8627754
OpenAlexW3208893155

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.