Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34699077›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2022

c4c: Paediatric pharmacovigilance: Methodological considerations in research and development of medicines for children - A c4c expert group white paper.

Beate Aurich, Dina Apele-Freimane, Tobias Banaschewski, Laurent Chouchana, Simon Day, Florentia Kaguelidou, Lauren E Kelly, Jenny M Kindblom, Antje Neubert, Ian C K Wong

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Beate AurichDepartment of Pharmacology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8830-023X
Dina Apele-FreimaneNeonatal Intensive Care, Women and Child Health Clinic, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-4666-4115
Tobias BanaschewskiDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4595-1144
Laurent ChouchanaRegional Center of Pharmacovigilance, Department of Pharmacology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Centre, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-3571
Simon DayClinical Trials Consulting and Training Limited, North Marston, UK.
Florentia KaguelidouDepartment of Pediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, APHP, Robert Debré Hospital; Center of Clinical Investigations, INSERM CIC1426, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Lauren E KellyDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7567-0816
Jenny M KindblomPaediatric Clinical Research Center, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8437-0639
Antje NeubertDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6575-1452
Ian C K WongCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children frequently respond differently to therapies compared to adults. Differences also exist between paediatric age groups for pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in both efficacy and safety. Paediatric pharmacovigilance requires an understanding of the unique aspects of children with regard to, for example, drug response, growth and development, clinical presentation of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), how they can be detected and population-specific factors (e.g., more frequent use of off-label/unlicensed drugs). In recognition of these challenges, a group of experts has been formed in the context of the conect4children (c4c) project to support paediatric drug development. This expert group collaborated to develop methodological considerations for paediatric drug safety and pharmacovigilance throughout the life-cycle of medicinal products which are described in this article. These considerations include practical points to consider for the development of the paediatric section of the risk management plan (RMP), safety in paediatric protocol development, safety data collection and analysis. Furthermore, they describe the specific details of post-marketing pharmacovigilance in children using, for example, spontaneous reports, electronic health care records, registries and record-linkage, as well as the use of paediatric pharmacoepidemiology studies for risk characterisation. Next the details of the assessment of benefit-risk and challenges related to medicinal product formulation in the context of a Paediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) are presented. Finally, practical issues in paediatric signal detection and evaluation are included. This paper provides practical points to consider for paediatric pharmacovigilance throughout the life-cycle of medicinal products for RMPs, protocol development, safety data collection and analysis and PIPs.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilanceAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsChildHumansPharmacoepidemiologyResearch Designadverse drug reactionbenefit-risk assessmentclinical trial protocolpaediatricpaediatric investigation planpharmacovigilancerisk managementsafety specificationsignal detection

Identifiers

PMID34699077
PMCPMC9788092

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.