Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34710139›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Responses of Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes to ozone treatment on non-host tomato: Efficacy of intervention and evidence of induced acclimation.

Xiaomei Shu, Manavi Singh, Naga Bhushana Rao Karampudi, David F Bridges, Ai Kitazumi, Vivian C H Wu, Benildo G De Los Reyes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Effectiveness of gaseous ozone onOpen veterinary journal · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Safety Properties ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. An Exploration ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaomei ShuDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States of America.
Manavi SinghDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States of America.
Naga Bhushana Rao KarampudiDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0503-4301
David F BridgesUSDA-ARS, Western Regional Research Center, Produce Safety and Microbiology Research, Albany, CA, United States of America.
Ai KitazumiDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States of America.
Vivian C H WuDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States of America.
Benildo G De Los ReyesDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5557-7398
Texas Tech University · USWestern Regional Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of the continuous rise of foodborne illnesses caused by the consumption of raw fruits and vegetables, effective post-harvest anti-microbial strategies are necessary. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-microbial efficacy of ozone (O3) against two common causes of fresh produce contamination, the Gram-negative Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Gram-positive Listeria monocytogenes, and to relate its effects to potential mechanisms of xenobiosis by transcriptional network modeling. The study on non-host tomato environment correlated the dose × time aspects of xenobiosis by examining the correlation between bacterial survival in terms of log-reduction and defense responses at the level of gene expression. In E. coli, low (1 μg O3/g of fruit) and moderate (2 μg O3/g of fruit) doses caused insignificant reduction in survival, while high dose (3 μg/g of fruit) caused significant reduction in survival in a time-dependent manner. In L. monocytogenes, moderate dose caused significant reduction even with short-duration exposure. Distinct responses to O3 xenobiosis between E. coli and L. monocytogenes are likely related to differences in membrane and cytoplasmic structure and components. Transcriptome profiling by RNA-Seq showed that primary defenses in E. coli were attenuated after exposure to a low dose, while the responses at moderate dose were characterized by massive upregulation of pathogenesis and stress-related genes, which implied the activation of defense responses. More genes were downregulated during the first hour at high dose, with a large number of such genes getting significantly upregulated after 2 hr and 3 hr. This trend suggests that prolonged exposure led to potential adaptation. In contrast, massive downregulation of genes was observed in L. monocytogenes regardless of dose and exposure duration, implying a mechanism of defense distinct from that of E. coli. The nature of bacterial responses revealed by this study should guide the selection of xenobiotic agents for eliminating bacterial contamination on fresh produce without overlooking the potential risks of adaptation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial LoadEscherichia coli O157Foodborne DiseasesFood MicrobiologyFruitGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, BacterialListeria monocytogenesMicrobial ViabilityOzoneProof of Concept StudyRNA, BacterialRNA-SeqSolanum lycopersicumTranscriptomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsOzoneRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID34710139
PMCPMC8553054
OpenAlexW3208812600

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.