Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34713086›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2021

Markup: A Web-Based Annotation Tool Powered by Active Learning.

Samuel Dobbie, Huw Strafford, W Owen Pickrell, Beata Fonferko-Shadrach, Carys Jones, Ashley Akbari, Simon Thompson, Arron Lacey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samuel DobbieHealth Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Huw StraffordHealth Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
W Owen PickrellSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Beata Fonferko-ShadrachSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Carys JonesSwansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Ashley AkbariHealth Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Simon ThompsonHealth Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Arron LaceyHealth Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across various domains, such as health and social care, law, news, and social media, there are increasing quantities of unstructured texts being produced. These potential data sources often contain rich information that could be used for domain-specific and research purposes. However, the unstructured nature of free-text data poses a significant challenge for its utilisation due to the necessity of substantial manual intervention from domain-experts to label embedded information. Annotation tools can assist with this process by providing functionality that enables the accurate capture and transformation of unstructured texts into structured annotations, which can be used individually, or as part of larger Natural Language Processing (NLP) pipelines. We present Markup (https://www.getmarkup.com/) an open-source, web-based annotation tool that is undergoing continued development for use across all domains. Markup incorporates NLP and Active Learning (AL) technologies to enable rapid and accurate annotation using custom user configurations, predictive annotation suggestions, and automated mapping suggestions to both domain-specific ontologies, such as the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), and custom, user-defined ontologies. We demonstrate a real-world use case of how Markup has been used in a healthcare setting to annotate structured information from unstructured clinic letters, where captured annotations were used to build and test NLP applications.

Indexed as

active learningannotationnatural language processingsequence-to-sequence learningunstructured text

Identifiers

PMID34713086
PMCPMC8521860

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.