SynthesisBioscience reports2021
Comprehensive functional network analysis and screening of deleterious pathogenic variants in non-syndromic hearing loss causative genes.
Synthesis in Bioscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hearing loss (HL) is a significant public health problem and causes the most frequent congenital disability in developed societies. The genetic analysis of non-syndromic hearing loss (NSHL) may be considered as a complement to the existent plethora of diagnostic modalities available. The present study focuses on exploring more target genes with respective non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) involved in the development of NSHL. The functional network analysis and variant study have successfully been carried out from the gene pool retrieved from reported research articles of the last decade. The analyses have been done through STRING. According to predicted biological processes, various variant analysis tools have successfully classified the NSHL causative genes and identified the deleterious nsSNPs, respectively. Among the predicted pathogenic nsSNPs with rsIDs rs80356586 (I515T), rs80356596 (L1011P), rs80356606 (P1987R) in OTOF have been reported in NSHL earlier. The rs121909642 (P722S), rs267606805 (P722H) in FGFR1, rs121918506 (E565A) and rs121918509 (A628T, A629T) in FGFR2 have not been reported in NSHL yet, which should be clinically experimented in NSHL. This also indicates this variant's novelty as its association in NSHL. The findings and the analyzed data have delivered some vibrant genetic pathogenesis of NSHL. These data might be used in the diagnostic and prognostic purposes in non-syndromic congenitally deaf children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.