Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716204›Full record

ArticleCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies2021

Somatic variation as an incidental finding in the pediatric next-generation sequencing era.

Marilena Melas, Mariam T Mathew, Mari Mori, Vijayakumar Jayaraman, Sarah A Wilson, Cortlandt Martin, Amanda E Jacobson-Kelly, Ben J Kelly, Vincent Magrini, Elaine R Mardis and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marilena MelasThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43215, USA.
Mariam T MathewThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43215, USA.
Mari MoriDepartment of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6425-7137
Vijayakumar JayaramanThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43215, USA.
Sarah A WilsonThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43215, USA.
Cortlandt MartinGenetic and Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43215, USA.
Amanda E Jacobson-KellyDepartment of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Ben J KellyThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43215, USA.
Vincent MagriniThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43215, USA.
Elaine R MardisThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43215, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5892-1553
Catherine E CottrellThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43215, USA.
Kristy LeeThe Steve and Cindy Rasmussen Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43215, USA.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The methodologic approach used in next-generation sequencing (NGS) affords a high depth of coverage in genomic analysis. Inherent in the nature of genomic testing, there exists potential for identifying genomic findings that are incidental or secondary to the indication for clinical testing, with the frequency dependent on the breadth of analysis and the tissue sample under study. The interpretation and management of clinically meaningful incidental genomic findings is a pressing issue particularly in the pediatric population. Our study describes a 16-mo-old male who presented with profound global delays, brain abnormality, progressive microcephaly, and growth deficiency, as well as metopic craniosynostosis. Clinical exome sequencing (ES) trio analysis revealed the presence of two variants in the proband. The first was a de novo variant in the

Indexed as

Incidental FindingsIntellectual DisabilityChildGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMalePhenotypecraniosynostosisDandy–Walker malformationsevere global developmental delay

Identifiers

PMID34716204
PMCPMC8751410
OpenAlexW3211056048

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.