Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34716918›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2022

Precision Reimbursement for Precision Medicine: Using Real-World Evidence to Evolve From Trial-and-Project to Track-and-Pay to Learn-and-Predict.

Hans-Georg Eichler, Mark Trusheim, Brigitte Schwarzer-Daum, Kay Larholt, Markus Zeitlinger, Martin Brunninger, Michael Sherman, David Strutton, Gigi Hirsch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Early access to medicines in Spain: a retrospective hospital study with a proposal for a regulatory change.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. [Personalized medicine in oncology].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hans-Georg EichlerMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2186-4161
Mark TrusheimMassachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Biomedical Innovation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6318-9037
Brigitte Schwarzer-DaumMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Kay LarholtMassachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Biomedical Innovation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Markus ZeitlingerMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin BrunningerDachverband der Sozialversicherungsträger, Vienna, Austria.
Michael ShermanPoint32Health, Wellesley, Massachusetts, USA.
David StruttonMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Gigi HirschMassachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Biomedical Innovation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5474-4628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Basic scientists and drug developers are accelerating innovations toward the goal of precision medicine. Regulators create pathways for timely patient access to precision medicines, including individualized therapies. Healthcare payors acknowledge the need for change but downstream innovation for coverage and reimbursement is only haltingly occurring. Performance uncertainty, high price-tags, payment timing, and actuarial risk issues associated with precision medicines present novel financial challenges for payors. With traditional drug reimbursement frameworks, payment is based on an assumed randomized controlled trial (RCT) projection of real-world effectiveness, a "trial-and-project" strategy; the clinical benefit realized for patients is not usually ascertained ex post by collection of real-world data (RWD). To mitigate financial risks resulting from clinical performance uncertainty, manufacturers and payors devised "track-and-pay" frameworks (i.e., the tracking of a pre-agreed treatment outcome which is linked to financial consequences). Whereas some track-and-pay arrangements have been successful, inherent weaknesses include the potential for misalignment of incentives, the risk of channeling of patients, and a failure to use the RWD generated to enable continuous learning about treatments. "Precision reimbursement" (PR) intends to overcome inherent weaknesses of simple track-and-pay schemes. In combining the collection of RWD with advanced analytics (e.g., artificial intelligence and machine learning) to generate actionable real-world evidence, with prospective alignment of incentives across all stakeholders (including providers and patients), and with pre-agreed use and dissemination of information generated, PR becomes a "learn-and-predict" model of payment for performance. We here describe in detail the concept of PR and lay out the next steps to make it a reality.

Indexed as

Insurance, Health, ReimbursementEvidence-Based MedicineForecastingHumansMachine LearningPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID34716918
PMCPMC9299639

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.