Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34720358›Full record

ArticleBuilding and environment2022

Design and in-vitro testing of a portable patient isolation chamber for bedside aerosol containment and filtration.

Ehsan S Mousavi, Ali Mohammadi Nafchi, John D DesJardins, Amanda S LeMatty, Robert J Falconer, Noah D Ashley, Benjamin S Roth, Phillip Moschella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Building and environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ehsan S MousaviNeiri Family Department of Construction Science and Management, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Ali Mohammadi NafchiNeiri Family Department of Construction Science and Management, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
John D DesJardinsDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Amanda S LeMattyDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Robert J FalconerDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Noah D AshleyDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
Benjamin S RothPrisma Health Upstate, University of South Carolina School of Medicine of Greenville, Greenville, SC, 29611, USA.
Phillip MoschellaPrisma Health Upstate, University of South Carolina School of Medicine of Greenville, Greenville, SC, 29611, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has imposed a multitude of complications on healthcare facilities. Healthcare professionals had to develop creative solutions to deal with resource shortages and isolation spaces when caring for COVID positive patients. Among many other solutions, facilities have utilized engineering strategies to mitigate the spread of viral contamination within the hospital environment. One of the standard solutions has been the use of whole room negative pressurization (WRNP) to turn a general patient room into an infection isolation space. However, this has not always been easy due to many limitations, such as direct access to the outdoors and the availability of WRNP units. In operating rooms where a patient is likely to go through aerosol-generating procedures, other solutions must be considered because most operating rooms use positive pressure ventilation to maintain sterility. The research team has designed, built, and tested a Covering for Operations during Viral Emergency Response (COVER), a low-cost, portable isolation chamber that fits over a patient's torso on a hospital bed to contain and remove the pathogenic agents at the source (i.e., patient's mouth and nose). This study tests the performance of the COVER system under various design and performance scenarios using particle tracing techniques and compares its efficiency with WRNP units. The results show that COVER can dramatically reduce the concentration of particles within the room, while WRNP is only effective in preventing the room-induced particles from migrating to adjacent spaces.

Indexed as

Aerosol containmentAirflow managementAir qualityCovid-19Healthcare

Identifiers

PMID34720358
PMCPMC8542519

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.