Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34724143›Full record

ReviewJournal of digital imaging2021

Biomedical Ontologies to Guide AI Development in Radiology.

Ross W Filice, Charles E Kahn

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Development of a Sexological Ontology.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ross W FiliceDepartment of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1142-3338
Charles E KahnDepartment of Radiology and Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. ckahn@upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6654-7434

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of deep learning has engendered renewed and rapidly growing interest in artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology to analyze images, manipulate textual reports, and plan interventions. Applications of deep learning and other AI approaches must be guided by sound medical knowledge to assure that they are developed successfully and that they address important problems in biomedical research or patient care. To date, AI has been applied to a limited number of real-world radiology applications. As AI systems become more pervasive and are applied more broadly, they will benefit from medical knowledge on a larger scale, such as that available through computer-based approaches. A key approach to represent computer-based knowledge in a particular domain is an ontology. As defined in informatics, an ontology defines a domain's terms through their relationships with other terms in the ontology. Those relationships, then, define the terms' semantics, or "meaning." Biomedical ontologies commonly define the relationships between terms and more general terms, and can express causal, part-whole, and anatomic relationships. Ontologies express knowledge in a form that is both human-readable and machine-computable. Some ontologies, such as RSNA's RadLex radiology lexicon, have been applied to applications in clinical practice and research, and may be familiar to many radiologists. This article describes how ontologies can support research and guide emerging applications of AI in radiology, including natural language processing, image-based machine learning, radiomics, and planning.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesRadiologyArtificial IntelligenceHumansNatural Language ProcessingRadiographyArtificial intelligenceControlled vocabularyKnowledge representationOntologyTerminology

Identifiers

PMID34724143
PMCPMC8669056

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.