Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34724962›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2021

Enhanced chromatin accessibility contributes to X chromosome dosage compensation in mammals.

Irene Talon, Adrian Janiszewski, Bart Theeuwes, Thomas Lefevre, Juan Song, Greet Bervoets, Lotte Vanheer, Natalie De Geest, Suresh Poovathingal, Ryan Allsop and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Compensation of gene dosage on the mammalian X.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. RNA stability controlled by mNature structural & molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Cohesin controls X chromosome structure remodeling and X-reactivation during mouse iPSC-reprogramming.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Irene Talon *Department of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Cellular Reprogramming and Epigenetic Regulation, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Adrian Janiszewski *Department of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Cellular Reprogramming and Epigenetic Regulation, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Bart TheeuwesDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Cellular Reprogramming and Epigenetic Regulation, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas LefevreLaboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Centre for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Juan SongDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Cellular Reprogramming and Epigenetic Regulation, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Greet BervoetsLaboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, VIB Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Lotte VanheerDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Cellular Reprogramming and Epigenetic Regulation, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Natalie De GeestDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Cellular Reprogramming and Epigenetic Regulation, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Suresh PoovathingalKU Leuven Institute for Single Cell Omics (LISCO), 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Ryan AllsopDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Cellular Reprogramming and Epigenetic Regulation, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Jean-Christophe MarineKU Leuven Institute for Single Cell Omics (LISCO), 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Florian RambowKU Leuven Institute for Single Cell Omics (LISCO), 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Thierry VoetKU Leuven Institute for Single Cell Omics (LISCO), 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Vincent PasqueDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Cellular Reprogramming and Epigenetic Regulation, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. vincent.pasque@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-5129-0146
IMEC · BEStem Cell Institute · PAVIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology · BEKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrecise gene dosage of the X chromosomes is critical for normal development and cellular function. In mice, XX female somatic cells show transcriptional X chromosome upregulation of their single active X chromosome, while the other X chromosome is inactive. Moreover, the inactive X chromosome is reactivated during development in the inner cell mass and in germ cells through X chromosome reactivation, which can be studied in vitro by reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency. How chromatin processes and gene regulatory networks evolved to regulate X chromosome dosage in the somatic state and during X chromosome reactivation remains unclear.

resultsUsing genome-wide approaches, allele-specific ATAC-seq and single-cell RNA-seq, in female embryonic fibroblasts and during reprogramming to pluripotency, we show that chromatin accessibility on the upregulated mammalian active X chromosome is increased compared to autosomes. We further show that increased accessibility on the active X chromosome is erased by reprogramming, accompanied by erasure of transcriptional X chromosome upregulation and the loss of increased transcriptional burst frequency. In addition, we characterize gene regulatory networks during reprogramming and X chromosome reactivation, revealing changes in regulatory states. Our data show that ZFP42/REX1, a pluripotency-associated gene that evolved specifically in placental mammals, targets multiple X-linked genes, suggesting an evolutionary link between ZFP42/REX1, X chromosome reactivation, and pluripotency.

conclusionsOur data reveal the existence of intrinsic compensatory mechanisms that involve modulation of chromatin accessibility to counteract X-to-Autosome gene dosage imbalances caused by evolutionary or in vitro X chromosome loss and X chromosome inactivation in mammalian cells.

Indexed as

X Chromosome InactivationAllelesAneuploidyAnimalsCellular ReprogrammingChromatinGene Regulatory NetworksInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMiceRNA-SeqSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticX ChromosomeChromatinTranscription FactorsChromatin accessibilityGene dosage compensationGene regulatory networksiPSC reprogrammingX chromosome inactivationX chromosome reactivationX chromosome upregulation

Identifiers

PMID34724962
PMCPMC8558763
OpenAlexW3210312617

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.