Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34725790›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Pluripotency Stemness and Cancer: More Questions than Answers.

Jiří Hatina, Michaela Kripnerová, Zbyněk Houdek, Martin Pešta, Filip Tichánek

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tfcp2l1 as a central integrator of hypoxia, dedifferentiation, and tumor progression.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Epigenetic Regulation of Driver Genes in Testicular Tumorigenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiří HatinaFaculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Institute of Biology, Charles University, Prague, Czechia. jiri.hatina@lfp.cuni.cz.
Michaela KripnerováFaculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Institute of Biology, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Zbyněk HoudekFaculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Institute of Biology, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Martin PeštaFaculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Institute of Biology, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Filip TichánekInstitute of Pathological Physiology, Plzen, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Physiology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells provided us with fascinating new knowledge in recent years. Mechanistic insight into intricate regulatory circuitry governing pluripotency stemness and disclosing parallels between pluripotency stemness and cancer instigated numerous studies focusing on roles of pluripotency transcription factors, including Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, Nanog, Sall4 and Tfcp2L1, in cancer. Although generally well substantiated as tumour-promoting factors, oncogenic roles of pluripotency transcription factors and their clinical impacts are revealing themselves as increasingly complex. In certain tumours, both Oct4 and Sox2 behave as genuine oncogenes, and reporter genes driven by composite regulatory elements jointly recognized by both the factors can identify stem-like cells in a proportion of tumours. On the other hand, cancer stem cells seem to be biologically very heterogeneous both among different tumour types and among and even within individual tumours. Pluripotency transcription factors are certainly implicated in cancer stemness, but do not seem to encompass its entire spectrum. Certain cancer stem cells maintain their stemness by biological mechanisms completely different from pluripotency stemness, sometimes even by engaging signalling pathways that promote differentiation of pluripotent stem cells. Moreover, while these signalling pathways may well be antithetical to stemness in pluripotent stem cells, they may cooperate with pluripotency factors in cancer stem cells - a paradigmatic example is provided by the MAPK-AP-1 pathway. Unexpectedly, forced expression of pluripotency transcription factors in cancer cells frequently results in loss of their tumour-initiating ability, their phenotypic reversion and partial epigenetic normalization. Besides the very different signalling contexts operating in pluripotent and cancer stem cells, respectively, the pronounced dose dependency of reprogramming pluripotency factors may also contribute to the frequent loss of tumorigenicity observed in induced pluripotent cancer cells. Finally, contradictory cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous effects of various signalling molecules operate during pluripotency (cancer) reprogramming. The effects of pluripotency transcription factors in cancer are thus best explained within the concept of cancer stem cell heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsNeoplasmsPluripotent Stem CellsCell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansOctamer Transcription Factor-3Transcription FactorsOctamer Transcription Factor-3Transcription FactorsAP-1Cancer stem cellsEmbryonic stem cellsInduced pluripotent cancer cellsInduced pluripotent stem cellsPluripotency reprogrammingPluripotency transcription factorsSarcoma

Identifiers

PMID34725790
OpenAlexW3209749688

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.