Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34736824›Full record

ArticleRadiography (London, England : 1995)2022

Experiences of diagnostic radiographers through the Covid-19 pandemic.

S Naylor, S Booth, J Harvey-Lloyd, R Strudwick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiography (London, England : 1995), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Being a technician during COVID-19: a qualitative cross-sectional survey on the experiences of clinical neurophysiology technicians.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. COVID-19 and its enduring influence on medical imaging.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S NaylorUniversity of Derby, Kedleston Rd, Derby DE22 1GB, UK. Electronic address: s.naylor@derby.ac.uk.
S BoothUniversity of Salford, Allerton Building, University of Salford, Manchester M6 6PU, UK. Electronic address: s.j.booth3@salford.ac.uk.
J Harvey-LloydUniversity of Suffolk, Waterfront Building, 19 Neptune Quay, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, UK. Electronic address: j.harvey-lloyd@uos.ac.uk.
R StrudwickUniversity of Suffolk, Waterfront Building, 19 Neptune Quay, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, UK. Electronic address: r.strudwick@uos.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiagnostic Radiography plays a major role in the diagnosis and management of patients with Covid-19. This has seen an increase in the demand for imaging services, putting pressure on the workforce. Diagnostic radiographers, as with many other healthcare professions, have been on the frontline, dealing with an unprecedented situation. This research aimed to explore the experience of diagnostic radiographers working clinically during the Covid-19 pandemic.

methodsInfluenced by interpretative phenomenology, this study explored the experiences of diagnostic radiographers using virtual focus group interviews as a method of data collection.

resultsData were analysed independently by four researchers and five themes emerged from the data. Adapting to new ways of working, feelings and emotions, support mechanisms, self-protection and resilience, and professional recognition.

conclusionThe adaptability of radiographers came across strongly in this study. Anxieties attributed to the provision of personal protective equipment (PPE), fear of contracting the virus and spreading it to family members were evident. The resilience of radiographers working throughout this pandemic came across strongly throughout this study. A significant factor for coping has been peer support from colleagues within the workplace. The study highlighted the lack of understanding of the role of the radiographer and how the profession is perceived by other health care professionals. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study highlights the importance of interprofessional working and that further work is required in the promotion of the profession.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAllied Health PersonnelHumansPersonal Protective EquipmentSARS-CoV-2Covid-19Interprofessional workingProfessional identityRadiography

Identifiers

PMID34736824
PMCPMC8552557

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.