Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34737920›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021

High-resolution intravascular magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary artery wall at 3.0 Tesla: toward evaluation of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability.

Yanfeng Meng, Zhiguang Mo, Jinying Hao, Yueyou Peng, Hui Yan, Jingbo Mu, Dengfeng Ma, Xiaoliang Zhang, Ye Li

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Coupled stack-up volume RF coils for low-field open MR imaging.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yanfeng MengDepartment of MRI, Taiyuan Central Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Zhiguang MoPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Jinying HaoDepartment of MRI, Taiyuan Central Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Yueyou PengDepartment of MRI, Taiyuan Central Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Hui YanDepartment of MRI, Taiyuan Central Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Jingbo MuDepartment of Cardiology, Taiyuan Central Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Dengfeng MaDepartment of Cardiology, Taiyuan Central Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Xiaoliang ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY, USA.
Ye LiPaul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Shanxi Medical University · CNTaiyuan Central Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology · CNUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo validate the feasibility of generating high-resolution intravascular 3.0 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary artery wall to further plaque imaging.

methodsA receive-only 0.014-inch diameter magnetic resonance imaging guidewire (MRIG) was manufactured for intravascular imaging within a phantom experiment and the coronary artery wall of the swine. For coronary artery wall imaging, both high-resolution images and conventional resolution images were acquired. A 16-channel commercial surface coil for magnetic resonance imaging was employed for the control group.

resultsFor the phantom experiment, the MRIG showed a higher signal-to-noise ratio than the surface coil. The peak signal-to-noise ratio of the MRIG and the surface coil-generated imaging were 213.6 and 19.8, respectively. The signal-to-noise ratio decreased rapidly as the distance from the MRIG increased. For the coronary artery wall experiment, the vessel wall imaging by the MRIG could be identified clearly, whereas the vessel wall imaging by the surface coil was blurred. The average signal-to-noise ratio of the artery wall was 21.1±5.40 by the MRIG compared to 8.4±2.19 by the surface coil, where the resolution was set at 0.2 mm × 0.2 mm × 2 mm. As expected, the high-resolution sequence clearly showed more details than the conventional resolution sequence set at 0.7 mm × 0.7 mm × 2.0 mm. Histological examination showed no evidence of mechanical injuries in the target vessel walls.

conclusionsThe study validated the feasibility of generating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 0.2 mm × 0.2 mm × 2 mm for the coronary artery wall using a 0.014 inch MRIG.

Indexed as

artery wall imaginghigh-resolutionIntravascular MRImagnetic resonance imaging guidewire (MRIG)

Identifiers

PMID34737920
PMCPMC8511738
OpenAlexW3190866698

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.