Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740631›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of ophthalmology2022

Molecular and Clinical Characterization of Human Adenovirus E4-Associated Conjunctivitis.

Russell N Van Gelder, Lakshmi Akileswaran, Kenji Nakamichi, David Stroman

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The seroprevalence of adenoviruses since 2000Emerging microbes & infections · 2025
    Review
  4. Human adenovirus in Taiwan, 2019-2023.Archives of virology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Viral Conjunctivitis.Viruses · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Russell N Van GelderFrom the Departments of Ophthalmology (R.N.V., L.A., K.N.) and Biological Structure and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (R.N.V.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, and NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc (D.S.), Emeryville, California, USA. Electronic address: russvg@uw.edu.
Lakshmi AkileswaranFrom the Departments of Ophthalmology (R.N.V., L.A., K.N.) and Biological Structure and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (R.N.V.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, and NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc (D.S.), Emeryville, California, USA.
Kenji NakamichiFrom the Departments of Ophthalmology (R.N.V., L.A., K.N.) and Biological Structure and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (R.N.V.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, and NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc (D.S.), Emeryville, California, USA.
David StromanFrom the Departments of Ophthalmology (R.N.V., L.A., K.N.) and Biological Structure and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (R.N.V.), University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, and NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc (D.S.), Emeryville, California, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Jay Neitz · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Molecular determinants of pathogenicity in viral conjunctivitisR21EY033174 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI VAN GELDER, RUSSELL N. · 2021 to 2022
$477k
Molecular epidemiology of adenoviral pathogenesis in keratoconjunctivitisR21EY027453 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI VAN GELDER, RUSSELL N. · 2017 to 2018
$440k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R21 EY027453NEI NIH HHS R21 EY033174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the characteristics of conjunctivitis associated with human adenovirus E4 (AdV E4).

methodsSamples and outcomes from 500 patients with conjunctivitis were obtained from the NVC-422 randomized controlled clinical trial comparing auriclosene to placebo. Molecular typing identified 36 cases associated with AdV E4. Signs and symptoms at presentation and at the day 18 endpoint were compared with the larger cohort of 262 subjects with conjunctivitis caused by due to AdV D8. Full viral genomes of 22 AdV E4 isolates were reconstructed.

resultsAdV E4 was the most frequently identified adenoviral type in conjunctivitis cases from the United States. Signs and symptoms at presentation were comparable to those associated with AdV D8. Viral load at presentation was comparable between groups but resolution was more rapid in the AdV E4 group. Clinical signs were fully resolved by day 18 in 26 of 36 (72%) patients with AdV E4. Subepithelial infiltrates developed in 12 of 36 (33%) patients with AdV E4 compared with 98 of 215 (45%) patients with AdV D8 (P = .0001). One hundred twenty-four polymorphisms were observed among 22 whole viral genome sequences, which clustered into 3 clades. Patients in each clade developed subepithelial infiltrates. Neither single nucleotide polymorphism analysis nor machine learning approaches identified specific sequence features predictive of presenting signs or outcome.

conclusionsAdV E4 conjunctivitis may be indistinguishable at presentation from AdV D8-associated disease. Resolution of viral load for AdV E4 appears more rapid than for AdV D8, and the risk for subepithelial infiltrates appears lower. Multiple substrains of AdV E4 are in circulation but all appeared equivalently pathogenic for conjunctivitis. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Indexed as

Adenoviruses, HumanAdenovirus Infections, HumanConjunctivitisConjunctivitis, ViralAdenoviridaeHumans

Identifiers

PMID34740631
PMCPMC9310136
OpenAlexW3208001168

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.