Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34740755›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2022

Obsessive-compulsive symptoms and the Covid-19 pandemic: A rapid scoping review.

Jon E Grant, Lynne Drummond, Timothy R Nicholson, Harry Fagan, David S Baldwin, Naomi A Fineberg, Samuel R Chamberlain

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jon E GrantDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Lynne DrummondSouth West London and St George's NHS Trust and University of Hertfordshire, UK.
Timothy R NicholsonInstitute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Harry FaganClinical and Experimental Sciences (CNS and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK; Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
David S BaldwinClinical and Experimental Sciences (CNS and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK; Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Naomi A FinebergNational Treatment Service for OCD (England and Wales), Hertfordshire, UK.
Samuel R ChamberlainClinical and Experimental Sciences (CNS and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK; Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. Electronic address: S.R.Chamberlain@soton.ac.uk.
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Hertfordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been much speculation about untoward effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on psychological symptoms. OCD may be expected to be especially impacted. Our aim was to distil the current evidence base on relationships between the pandemic and obsessive-compulsive symptoms, in patients, and general population samples.

methodsWe conducted a rapid scoping review, in the form of a systematic literature search, coupled with narrative review. 32 relevant papers were identified. RESULTS AND

interpretation(1) A sizable proportion of people with OCD (but not all) experienced/reported symptom worsening during the pandemic, especially during initial restrictions (approximately 20-65 % of cases in longitudinal studies); (2) contamination/washing symptoms appeared particularly susceptible; and (3) OCD symptoms in general population samples were associated with trait compulsivity and pandemic-related-stress. The literature was heterogeneous with various methodological issues being commonplace. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: The review identified important unaddressed issues: how should exposure based therapy be adapted during pandemics? How can we minimise harm from exacerbation of OCD in vulnerable individuals arising from public health messaging? Why do some but not all OCD patients experience worsening? And does Covid-19 infection affect (or lead to) OCD symptoms?

Indexed as

COVID-19Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderHumansLongitudinal StudiesPandemicsSARS-CoV-2C19CompulsiveCovidCovid-19ImpulsiveObsessivePandemicReviewSystematic

Identifiers

PMID34740755
PMCPMC8570941
OpenAlexW3209167497

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.