Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34746112›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021

Advances and Prospects in Biomaterials for Intervertebral Disk Regeneration.

Chunxu Li, Qiushi Bai, Yuxiao Lai, Jingjing Tian, Jiahao Li, Xiaodan Sun, Yu Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chunxu LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qiushi BaiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuxiao LaiCentre for Translational Medicine Research and Development, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Jingjing TianMedical Science Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiahao LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaodan SunState Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yu ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-back and neck-shoulder pains caused by intervertebral disk degeneration are highly prevalent among middle-aged and elderly people globally. The main therapy method for intervertebral disk degeneration is surgical intervention, including interbody fusion, disk replacement, and diskectomy. However, the stress changes caused by traditional fusion surgery are prone to degeneration of adjacent segments, while non-fusion surgery has problems, such as ossification of artificial intervertebral disks. To overcome these drawbacks, biomaterials that could endogenously regenerate the intervertebral disk and restore the biomechanical function of the intervertebral disk is imperative. Intervertebral disk is a fibrocartilaginous tissue, primarily comprising nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus. Nucleus pulposus (NP) contains high water and proteoglycan, and its main function is absorbing compressive forces and dispersing loads from physical activities to other body parts. Annulus fibrosus (AF) is a multilamellar structure that encloses the NP, comprises water and collagen, and supports compressive and shear stress during complex motion. Therefore, different biomaterials and tissue engineering strategies are required for the functional recovery of NP and AF based on their structures and function. Recently, great progress has been achieved on biomaterials for NP and AF made of functional polymers, such as chitosan, collagen, polylactic acid, and polycaprolactone. However, scaffolds regenerating intervertebral disk remain unexplored. Hence, several tissue engineering strategies based on cell transplantation and growth factors have been extensively researched. In this review, we summarized the functional polymers and tissue engineering strategies of NP and AF to endogenously regenerate degenerative intervertebral disk. The perspective and challenges of tissue engineering strategies using functional polymers, cell transplantation, and growth factor for generating degenerative intervertebral disks were also discussed.

Indexed as

anulus fibrosusbiomaterialcartilage endplatedegenerationintervertebral discnucleus pulposus

Identifiers

PMID34746112
PMCPMC8569141
OpenAlexW3208309091

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.