ArticleGenome medicine2021
Constructing germline research cohorts from the discarded reads of clinical tumor sequences.
Article in Genome medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cancers modulate processing and presentation of p53 neoantigens to evade T cell detection.Immunity · 2026Article
- DPP9-mediated inflammasome repression protects against checkpoint inhibitor lung toxicity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Limited overlap between genetic effects on disease susceptibility and disease survival.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- The Germline and Somatic Origins of Prostate Cancer Heterogeneity.Cancer discovery · 2025Article
- A consensus-based classification workflow to determine genetically inferred ancestry from comprehensive genomic profiling of patients with solid tumors.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Additional impact of genetic ancestry over race/ethnicity to prevalence of KRAS mutations and allele-specific subtypes in non-small cell lung cancer.HGG advances · 2024Article
- Leveraging Off-Target Reads in Panel Sequencing for Homologous Recombination Repair Deficiency Screening in Tumor.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2024Article
- Assessing the efficacy of target adaptive sampling long-read sequencing through hereditary cancer patient genomes.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Article
- A comprehensive analysis of clinical and polygenic germline influences on somatic mutational burden.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Long read sequencing on its way to the routine diagnostics of genetic diseases.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Identifying risk variants for embryo aneuploidy using ultra-low coverage whole-genome sequencing from preimplantation genetic testing.American journal of human genetics · 2023Article
- A Polygenic Risk Score for Predicting Racial and Genetic Susceptibility to Prurigo Nodularis.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2023Article
- Germline mechanisms of immunotherapy toxicities in the era of genome-wide association studies.Immunological reviews · 2023Review
- Genotype error due to low-coverage sequencing induces uncertainty in polygenic scoring.American journal of human genetics · 2023Article
- Machine learning for genetics-based classification and treatment response prediction in cancer of unknown primary.Nature medicine · 2023Article
- Germline Cancer Gene Expression Quantitative Trait Loci Are Associated with Local and Global Tumor Mutations.Cancer research · 2023Article
- Germline-mediated immunoediting sculpts breast cancer subtypes and metastatic proclivity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The cancer-risk variant frequency among Polish population reported by the first national whole-genome sequencing study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Accurate genome-wide genotyping from archival tissue to explore the contribution of common genetic variants to pre-cancer outcomes.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHundreds of thousands of cancer patients have had targeted (panel) tumor sequencing to identify clinically meaningful mutations. In addition to improving patient outcomes, this activity has led to significant discoveries in basic and translational domains. However, the targeted nature of clinical tumor sequencing has a limited scope, especially for germline genetics. In this work, we assess the utility of discarded, off-target reads from tumor-only panel sequencing for the recovery of genome-wide germline genotypes through imputation.
methodsWe developed a framework for inference of germline variants from tumor panel sequencing, including imputation, quality control, inference of genetic ancestry, germline polygenic risk scores, and HLA alleles. We benchmarked our framework on 833 individuals with tumor sequencing and matched germline SNP array data. We then applied our approach to a prospectively collected panel sequencing cohort of 25,889 tumors.
resultsWe demonstrate high to moderate accuracy of each inferred feature relative to direct germline SNP array genotyping: individual common variants were imputed with a mean accuracy (correlation) of 0.86, genetic ancestry was inferred with a correlation of > 0.98, polygenic risk scores were inferred with a correlation of > 0.90, and individual HLA alleles were inferred with a correlation of > 0.80. We demonstrate a minimal influence on the accuracy of somatic copy number alterations and other tumor features. We showcase the feasibility and utility of our framework by analyzing 25,889 tumors and identifying the relationships between genetic ancestry, polygenic risk, and tumor characteristics that could not be studied with conventional on-target tumor data.
conclusionsWe conclude that targeted tumor sequencing can be leveraged to build rich germline research cohorts from existing data and make our analysis pipeline publicly available to facilitate this effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.