Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34749812›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2021

Multiscale heterogeneity in gastric adenocarcinoma evolution is an obstacle to precision medicine.

Christoph Röcken, Anu Amallraja, Christine Halske, Luka Opasic, Arne Traulsen, Hans-Michael Behrens, Sandra Krüger, Anne Liu, Jochen Haag, Jan-Hendrik Egberts and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. MDM2 amplification is rare in gastric cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christoph RöckenDepartment of Pathology, Christian-Albrechts-University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus U33, D-24105, Kiel, Germany. christoph.roecken@uksh.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6989-8002
Anu AmallrajaDepartment of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, USA.
Christine HalskeDepartment of Pathology, Christian-Albrechts-University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus U33, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Luka OpasicDepartment of Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Arne TraulsenDepartment of Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Hans-Michael BehrensDepartment of Pathology, Christian-Albrechts-University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus U33, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Sandra KrügerDepartment of Pathology, Christian-Albrechts-University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus U33, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Anne LiuDepartment of Pathology, Christian-Albrechts-University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus U33, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Jochen HaagDepartment of Pathology, Christian-Albrechts-University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus U33, D-24105, Kiel, Germany.
Jan-Hendrik EgbertsDepartment of General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Philip RosenstielDepartment of General Surgery, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Tobias MeißnerInstitute for Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology · DEAvera Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer is a somatic evolutionary disease and adenocarcinomas of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction (GC) may serve as a two-dimensional model of cancer expansion, in which tumor subclones are not evenly mixed during tumor progression but rather spatially separated and diversified. We hypothesize that precision medicine efforts are compromised when clinical decisions are based on a single-sample analysis, which ignores the mechanisms of cancer evolution and resulting intratumoral heterogeneity. Using multiregional whole-exome sequencing, we investigated the effect of somatic evolution on intratumoral heterogeneity aiming to shed light on the evolutionary biology of GC.

methodsThe study comprised a prospective discovery cohort of 9 and a validation cohort of 463 GCs. Multiregional whole-exome sequencing was performed using samples form 45 primary tumors and 3 lymph node metastases (range 3-10 tumor samples/patient) of the discovery cohort.

resultsIn total, the discovery cohort harbored 16,537 non-synonymous mutations. Intratumoral heterogeneity of somatic mutations and copy number variants were present in all tumors of the discovery cohort. Of the non-synonymous mutations, 53-91% were not present in each patient's sample; 399 genes harbored 2-4 different non-synonymous mutations in the same patient; 175 genes showed copy number variations, the majority being heterogeneous, including CD274 (PD-L1). Multi-sample tree-based analyses provided evidence for branched evolution being most complex in a microsatellite instable GC. The analysis of the mode of evolution showed a high degree of heterogeneity in deviation from neutrality within each tumor. We found evidence of parallel evolution and evolutionary trajectories: different mutations of SMAD4 aligned with different subclones and were found only in TP53 mutant GCs.

conclusionsNeutral and non-neutral somatic evolution shape the mutational landscape in GC along its lateral expansions. It leads to complex spatial intratumoral heterogeneity, where lymph node metastases may stem from different areas of the primary tumor, synchronously. Our findings may have profound effects on future patient management. They illustrate the risk of mis-interpreting tumor genetics based on single-sample analysis and open new avenues for an evolutionary classification of GC, i.e., the discovery of distinct evolutionary trajectories which can be utilized for precision medicine.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAdenocarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overB7-H1 AntigenClonal EvolutionCohort StudiesDNA Copy Number VariationsExomeExome SequencingGenetic HeterogeneityHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedMutationPhylogenyB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanSmad4 ProteinSMAD4 protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53EvolutionGastric cancerIntratumoral heterogeneitySMAD4TP53

Identifiers

PMID34749812
PMCPMC8576943
OpenAlexW3127040939

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.