ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2022
A Visual Phenotype-Based Differential Diagnosis Process for Rare Diseases.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A graph neural network approach for accurate prediction of pathogenicity in multi-type variants.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- RDguru: An Intelligent Agent for Rare Diseases.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposePhenotype-based rapid diagnosis can make up for the time-consuming genetic sequencing diagnosis of rare diseases. However, the collected phenotypes of patients can sometimes be inaccurate or incomplete, which limits the accuracy of diagnostic results. To solve this problem, we try to design a phenotype-based differential diagnosis process for rare diseases to achieve rapid and accurate diagnosis of rare diseases.
methodsThe core of the differential diagnosis of rare diseases is to optimize the phenotype information of a specific patient and the visualized comparative analysis of diseases. To recommend additional phenotypes, replace the fuzzy phenotypes and filter the unexplained phenotypes for patients, we constructed a phenotype hierarchical network and a disease-phenotype differential network and calculated the phenotype co-occurrence relationship. In addition, we designed a visual comparative analysis method to explore the correlation and difference of disease phenotypes.
resultsThe evaluation based on the published 10 rare disease cases demonstrated that after the optimization of patient phenotype information through our differential diagnosis, the target disease often got a better ranking and recommendation score than before. We have deployed this scheme on the RDmap project ( http://rdmap.nbscn.org ).
conclusionCompared to genetic and molecular analysis, phenotype-based diagnosis is faster, cheaper, and easier. The differential diagnosis process we designed can optimize the phenotype information of patients and better locate the target disease. It can also help to make screening decisions before genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.