Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34757173›Full record

SynthesisAgeing research reviews2021

The effect of remotely delivered lifestyle interventions on cognition in older adults without dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tim Whitfield, Brittany McConnell, Philippa Renouf, Hassan Mansour, Sedigheh Zabihi, Elisa Aguirre, Zuzana Walker, Claudia Cooper, Natalie L Marchant

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ageing research reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tim WhitfieldDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Brittany McConnellDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Philippa RenoufDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Hassan MansourDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Sedigheh ZabihiDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Elisa AguirreDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; North East London Mental Health Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Zuzana WalkerDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Essex, UK.
Claudia CooperDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Natalie L MarchantDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: n.marchant@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Up to 40% of dementias may be preventable via risk factor modification. This inference has motivated the development of lifestyle interventions for reducing cognitive decline. Typically delivered to older adults face-to-face, the COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated their adaptation for remote delivery. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of remotely delivered lifestyle interventions (≥4 weeks duration and delivered >50% remotely), for adults aged ≥ 60 without dementia, examining effects on objective cognitive measures. Comparators were active (face-to-face or remote) or passive. Ten studies (n = 2967) comprising multidomain (k = 4), physical activity (k = 3) or psychosocial (k = 3) remote interventions were included. Data were synthesized using robust variance estimation meta-analysis. The pooled estimate comparing the effect of remote interventions versus comparators on cognition was not significant (g=-0.02; 95%CI [-0.14, 0.09]; p = .66); subgroup analyses by type of intervention or comparator also yielded non-significant effects. Most studies had low risk of bias. Current evidence to support remote lifestyle interventions is limited. Included studies were conducted pre-pandemic, and evaluated individual, rather than group interventions. Future studies may exploit the greater digital connectivity of older people since the pandemic. Group formats, more frequently efficacious than individual interventions in face-to-face dementia prevention trials, may be a rational approach for future remote trials.

Indexed as

COVID-19DementiaAgedCognitionHumansLife StylePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Cognitive functionDementiaMild cognitive impairmentPreventionRandomized controlled trialRemote delivery

Identifiers

PMID34757173
PMCPMC9761296

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.