Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34758744›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2021

Rabbit microbiota across the whole body revealed by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.

Xiaofen Hu, Fei Wang, Shanshan Yang, Xu Yuan, Tingyu Yang, Yunxiao Zhou, Yong Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Gut microbiota and meat quality.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaofen HuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, Jiangxi, China.
Fei WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, Jiangxi, China.
Shanshan YangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, Jiangxi, China.
Xu YuanCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, Jiangxi, China.
Tingyu YangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, Jiangxi, China.
Yunxiao ZhouCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, Jiangxi, China.
Yong LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, Jiangxi, China. liyong2912@163.com.
Jiangxi Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRabbit can produce meat, fur and leather, and serves as an important biomedical animal model. Understanding the microbial community of rabbits helps to raise rabbits healthily and better support their application as animal models.

resultsIn this study, we selected 4 healthy Belgium gray rabbits to collect the microbial samples from 12 body sites, including skin, lung, uterus, mouth, stomach, duodenum, ileum, jejunum, colon, cecum, cecal appendix and rectum. The microbiota across rabbit whole body was investigated via 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. After quality control, 46 samples were retained, and 3,148 qualified ASVs were obtained, representing 23 phyla and 264 genera. Based on the weighted UniFrac distances, these samples were divided into the large intestine (Lin), stomach and small intestine (SSin), uterus (Uter), and skin, mouth and lung (SML) groups. The diversity of Lin microbiota was the highest, followed by those of the SSin, Uter and SML groups. In the whole body, Firmicutes (62.37%), Proteobacteria (13.44%) and Bacteroidota (11.84%) were the most predominant phyla. The relative abundance of Firmicutes in the intestinal tract was significantly higher than that in the non-intestinal site, while Proteobacteria was significantly higher in the non-intestinal site. Among the 264 genera, 35 were the core microbiota distributed in all body sites. Sixty-one genera were specific in the SML group, while 13, 8 and 1 were specifically found in the Lin, SSin and Uter groups, respectively. The Lin group had the most difference with other groups, there were average 72 differential genera between the Lin and other groups. The functional prediction analysis showed that microbial function within each group was similar, but there was a big difference between the intestinal tracts and the non-intestinal group. Notably, the function of microorganism in uterus and mouth were the most different from those in the gastrointestinal sites; rabbit's coprophagy of consuming soft feces possibly resulted in little differences of microbial function between stomach and large intestinal sites.

conclusionOur findings improve the knowledge about rabbit microbial communities throughout whole body and give insights into the relationship of microbial communities among different body sites in health rabbits.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaDNA, BacterialFecesGastrointestinal TractLungMouthPhylogenyRabbitsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASkinDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA genemicrobial communityRabbitwhole body sites

Identifiers

PMID34758744
PMCPMC8579649
OpenAlexW3211652051

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.