Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34759796›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Optimal Course of Statins for Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Is Longer Treatment Better? A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Tao Liu, Shiyu Zhong, Qingqing Zhai, Xudong Zhang, Huiquan Jing, Kunhang Li, Shengyu Liu, Shuo Han, Lishuai Li, Xin Shi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pharmacotherapy in SAH: Clinical Trial Lessons.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tao LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Shiyu ZhongDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Qingqing ZhaiSchool of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Xudong ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Huiquan JingSchool of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Kunhang LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Shengyu LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Shuo HanDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Lishuai LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xin ShiSchool of Maths and Information Science, Shandong Institute of Business and Technology, Yantai, China.
Yijun BaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University · CNCapital Medical University · CNChina Medical University · CNManchester Metropolitan University · GBShanghai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statins are used in clinical practice to prevent from complications such as cerebral vasospasm (CVS) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, the efficacy and safety of statins are still controversial due to insufficient evidence from randomized controlled trials and inconsistent results of the existing studies. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically review the latest evidence on the time window and complications of statins in aSAH. The randomized controlled trials in the databases of The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang from January 2005 to April 2021 were searched and analyzed systematically. Data analysis was performed using Stata version 16.0. The fixed-effects model (M-H method) with effect size risk ratio (RR) was used for subgroups with homogeneity, and the random-effects model (D-L method) with effect size odds ratio (OR) was used for subgroups with heterogeneity. The primary outcomes were poor neurological prognosis and all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were cerebral vasospasm (CVS) and statin-related complications. This study was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42021247376). Nine studies comprising 1,464 patients were included. The Jadad score of the patients was 5-7. Meta-analysis showed that poor neurological prognosis was reduced in patients who took oral statins for 14 days (RR, 0.73 [0.55-0.97];

Indexed as

aneurysmalcomplicationsmeta-analysisoutcomestatinssubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID34759796
PMCPMC8573116
OpenAlexW3208179477

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.