Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34760747›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2021

COVID-19 treatment in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Prateek Kumar Panda, Indar Kumar Sharawat, Vivekanand Natarajan, Rahul Bhakat, Pragnya Panda, Lesa Dawman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prateek Kumar PandaPediatric Neurology Division, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Indar Kumar SharawatPediatric Neurology Division, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Vivekanand NatarajanPediatric Neurology Division, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Rahul BhakatPediatric Neurology Division, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Pragnya PandaDepartment of Medicine, SCB Medical College, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
Lesa DawmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences RishikeshPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExact information about the efficacy of various medications proposed by regulatory bodies in children with COVID-19 is limited due to the lack of controlled trials in the existing literature.

methodsDifferent electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, COCHRANE CENTRAL, LitCovid, medRxiv, and bioRxiv) were searched for articles describing the management of COVID-19 cases in children with 18 shortlisted medications. Prospective/retrospective studies/case series (with at least 20 cases) reporting COVID-19 in patients aged ≤14 years were searched to collect information regarding clinical details and severity of participants, medications used, and outcome. The pooled estimate of these parameters across studies was performed using a random-effect or fixed-effect meta-analysis depending on the degree of heterogeneity.

resultsFrom a total of 5794 records, 97 studies/case series (8243 patients) fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. A total of 21% children received at least one medication specifically used for COVID-19. While antivirals were used in 15.3% of children, remedesivir was the most commonly used antiviral drug in 6.2% of included children without many reports of serious adverse effects. There was a more prevalent use of anti-inflammatory medications including corticosteroids (27.8%,

conclusionAmong pharmacological modalities, anti-inflammatory agents like corticosteroids and antivirals like remdesivir have the most promising evidence for severe cases of pediatric COVID-19. Intravenous immunoglobulin and other anti-inflammatory/immunomodulatory agents like anakinra, aspirin, and anticoagulants have important therapeutic role in cases with MIS-C. Most of the mild cases recover with conservative treatment only.

Indexed as

Hydroxychloroquinelopinavir/ritonavirMIS-Cremdesivirribavirin; SARS-CoV-2tocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID34760747
PMCPMC8565105
OpenAlexW3204799215

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.