Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34762640›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Optimizing network propagation for multi-omics data integration.

Konstantina Charmpi, Manopriya Chokkalingam, Ronja Johnen, Andreas Beyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Konstantina CharmpiCECAD Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases, Cologne, Germany.
Manopriya ChokkalingamCECAD Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases, Cologne, Germany.
Ronja JohnenCECAD Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5150-5266
Andreas BeyerCECAD Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3891-2123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network propagation refers to a class of algorithms that integrate information from input data across connected nodes in a given network. These algorithms have wide applications in systems biology, protein function prediction, inferring condition-specifically altered sub-networks, and prioritizing disease genes. Despite the popularity of network propagation, there is a lack of comparative analyses of different algorithms on real data and little guidance on how to select and parameterize the various algorithms. Here, we address this problem by analyzing different combinations of network normalization and propagation methods and by demonstrating schemes for the identification of optimal parameter settings on real proteome and transcriptome data. Our work highlights the risk of a 'topology bias' caused by the incorrect use of network normalization approaches. Capitalizing on the fact that network propagation is a regularization approach, we show that minimizing the bias-variance tradeoff can be utilized for selecting optimal parameters. The application to real multi-omics data demonstrated that optimal parameters could also be obtained by either maximizing the agreement between different omics layers (e.g. proteome and transcriptome) or by maximizing the consistency between biological replicates. Furthermore, we exemplified the utility and robustness of network propagation on multi-omics datasets for identifying ageing-associated genes in brain and liver tissues of rats and for elucidating molecular mechanisms underlying prostate cancer progression. Overall, this work compares different network propagation approaches and it presents strategies for how to use network propagation algorithms to optimally address a specific research question at hand.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgingAnimalsBiasBrainComputational BiologyData Interpretation, StatisticalDisease ProgressionGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsHumansLiverMaleProstatic NeoplasmsProtein Interaction MapsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID34762640
PMCPMC8664198

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.