Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34763728›Full record

ReviewIMA fungus2021

The genus Entomophthora: bringing the insect destroyers into the twenty-first century.

Carolyn Elya, Henrik H De Fine Licht

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IMA fungus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Non-feline transmission of sporotrichosis: a systematic review of published cases.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Endophytic entomopathogenic fungi: The next frontier in mycological biocontrol.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Evidence thatbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Entomopathogenic fungi: insights into recent understanding.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Discovery ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Isolation of a NovelJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carolyn ElyaDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. cnelya@g.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9634-0303
Henrik H De Fine LichtDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1871, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Funding

Carlsbergfondet Young Researcher FellowshipDanmarks Frie Forskningsfond (DK) Sapere AudeHoward Hughes Medical Institute Hanna H Gray Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fungal genus Entomophthora consists of highly host-specific pathogens that cause deadly epizootics in their various insect hosts. The most well-known among these is the "zombie fly" fungus E. muscae, which, like other Entomophthora species, elicits a series of dramatic behaviors in infected hosts to promote optimal spore dispersal. Despite having been first described more than 160 years ago, there are still many open questions about Entomophthora biology, including the molecular underpinnings of host behavior manipulation and host specificity. This review provides a comprehensive overview of our current understanding of the biology of Entomophthora fungi and enumerates the most pressing outstanding questions that should be addressed in the field. We briefly review the discovery of Entomophthora and provide a summary of the 21 recognized Entomophthora species, including their type hosts, methods of transmission (ejection of spores after or before host death), and for which molecular data are available. Further, we argue that this genus is globally distributed, based on a compilation of Entomophthora records in the literature and in online naturalist databases, and likely to contain additional species. Evidence for strain-level specificity of hosts is summarized and directly compared to phylogenies of Entomophthora and the class Insecta. A detailed description of Entomophthora's life-cycle and observed manipulated behaviors is provided and used to summarize a consensus for ideal growth conditions. We discuss evidence for Entomophthora's adaptation to growth exclusively inside insects, such as producing wall-less hyphal bodies and a unique set of subtilisin-like proteases to penetrate the insect cuticle. However, we are only starting to understand the functions of unusual molecular and genomic characteristics, such as having large > 1 Gb genomes full of repetitive elements and potential functional diploidy. We argue that the high host-specificity and obligate life-style of most Entomophthora species provides ample scope for having been shaped by close coevolution with insects despite the current general lack of such evidence. Finally, we propose six major directions for future Entomophthora research and in doing so hope to provide a foundation for future studies of these fungi and their interaction with insects.

Indexed as

Behavioral manipulationCoevolutionEarly-diverging fungiEntomopathogensEntomophthoralesFungal pathogensInsect–fungus interactionsZoopagomycota

Identifiers

PMID34763728
PMCPMC8588673

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.